Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will we not know the QB situ until the draft or...


Lumps

Recommended Posts

maybe even mid-camp?

panthers.com is trying to cover it it up with their new article 'QB review' article that's CRAP imo, and just a waste of a read.

Reading between the lines and remembering Fox is staying makes me think the panthers still don't know who to start which is really starting to freak me out...every day it seems most more likely Jake will be back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I assume if we use our very first pick in the draft on a QB instead of a WR we aren't looking Jake's way...so camp or not I think that will tell us. Although that still leaves us with Fox, Jake and Matt.

so if one of those two is to start should that not be released soon?

or are we going to make both QBs think teh panthers have no confidence in them until gametime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we know before training camp or preseason. Isn't the purpose of the preseason to establish the starters? One of things people always complain about is that there isn't any competition in training camp and people are just giving the starters roles whether they deserve it or not. Now when that is what Fox wants to do, people whine and complain because Moore hasn't been named the starter 6 months before hand.

Answer this question? Do you think players try harder and work more when they are in a competition for their jobs or when they are handed the role no matter how they perform?

Anyone think Godfrey coming back and playing so much better was because Martin did so well when he was substituting for Godfrey.

If you think about it for anytime you will clearly see that competition should happen across the board at all positions every year.

With this being Fox's last year expect everyone to be fighting for a job and the competition to be intense this summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What 55 said. And I'm pretty sure that Panthers.com isn't trying to cover anything up.

Totally agree. Expecting Panthers.com to say anything negative about the team is ridiculous. It is the team's website and the articles and material are going to be skewed postively toward the team. That is the point. I expect their motto is if you can't say anything nice, you say nothing at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing Fox it will be a "game time decision".....

Haha true... Thats one thing I wish would change about Carolina... as a fan you never know whats going on with the team, you never hear about them on espn or anything. It will be awhile before you know who's the starter... Moore deserves it but it could be Delhomme... who knows but I'm thinking Moore will start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For us to even think Delhomme has a shot at starting again because we haven't declared Moore the starter yet just shows how much of a joke Fox is to still contemplate starting a guy who was the worst starting QB last season or Moore who completely blew him out of the water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, let's hope all get threu the preseason healthy! If Moore insn't hurt in that, he's GOTTA start! I can't imagine Jerry R. not getting involved if that doesn't happen. Jerry R. is 'getting up there' in years. I'm sure he wants to exit with a ring. I don't think Jake provides that chance anymore as a starter. If Jake is Moore's backup, I think that can work. But what an expensive backup he would be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...