Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adrian Peterson is NOT better than Deangelo or J-Stew


SOJA

Recommended Posts

Peterson can be great at times, but his turnovers kill you. And tonight he wasn't alone.

Any one of those turnovers either doesn't happen or gets recovered and the Vikings probably win.

Favre's ego really got the better of him on that game ender. He should have just run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson doesn't have the leauge's best backup. Williams and stewart swap out every series, so they have an advantage there. They're fresher and less likely to get injured. The more touches you get the harder it is to keep up a high YPC and the energy to make the same plays you do when you're fresh.

You have no idea how they would fair the whole season as a feature back. The evidence says they would be pretty good, but you can't say a player's better based on hypothetical situations.

Producing more and having better physical traits doesn't just magically make you better than the other guy. However, it's entirely rational, and fair for the guy that does to be heralded and celebrated as the best. It's just plain wrong to give credit based on ifs and buts.

No matter how likely it is, you can't give credit based on the unkown. It's not fair to the players who have actually done it. That's just how it works.

It's not like the scouts listen to ESPN, buy one of those scouting magazines

in the offseason and I'm sure Willams/Stewart will be the cream of the crop.

But you don't deserve to go to the probowl, be an All Pro, or a HoFer just because of how good you COULD be or what you WOULD do under certain circumstances.

Good post.

People actually buying the scouting magazines and such?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I can say, with perfect objectivity, given the choice I'd take Williams.

Williams can do what Peterson does, and do it without the fumbles. That's a pretty clear cut choice.

Not buying the backup argument either. Chester Taylor is no slouch and has seen plenty of duty (especially this season).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I can say, with perfect objectivity, given the choice I'd take Williams.

Williams can do what Peterson does, and do it without the fumbles. That's a pretty clear cut choice.

Not buying the backup argument either. Chester Taylor is no slouch and has seen plenty of duty (especially this season).

I know I said Stewart is the best backup in the leauge but what I was trying to convey is the fact that they split carries more evenly than most tandems.

But talent does matter a little. Stewart scares defenses more than Taylor. Stewart and Williams are interchangable, going from AP to Taylor there's a drop off.

When AP arrived Chester Taylor saw a jump in his YPC and he had more TDs. The year that they both shared carries in 2007 is the best total rushing yardage they have put up since AP has been there. And this year taylor actually saw less carries than any year AP has been there. The more Taylor participates the higher AP's YPC gets.

Look at how reggie bush blossomed once he didn't have to carry the load. The saints also had much more rushing yards once they got more talent into the backfield and shared carries.

Somehow even we beat last years rushing totals when stewart/williams shared carries evenly. We also brought in more talent in the backups which helped too.

When you have good talented backfield sharing carries it is much easier than just having one blue chip guy do all the work.

I'm sure there are exceptions and I'm pretty tired so I don't know how sound my case is. There are plenty of other factors that tie into this. Every season is different so I don't really like using stats but it kind of illustrates what I'm trying to say. But here's my summary.

You can't assume a linear curve in projecting a RB's stats based on his YPC or touchdowns when he's sharing carries or doesn't play a full season. When you share carries you are better utlized so you get a better YPC average and TDs on less carries. Also the talented guy keeps you fresh by absorbing the hits you would be taking.

From what I've seen the totals for team rushing yardage goes up when you have talent in the backfield and share carries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush blossomed because he isn't a running back, he's a wide receiver.

It's obvious that if a running back shares the load he's going to play better. It's Childress' fault he doesn't give Taylor the ball more often, he's a very capable running back and with the way Peterson runs he's drastically shortening his career. Chris Johnson is going to shorten his career too because he refuses to share the load with White.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson doesn't have the leauge's best backup. Williams and stewart swap out every series, so they have an advantage there. They're fresher and less likely to get injured. The more touches you get the harder it is to keep up a high YPC and the energy to make the same plays you do when you're fresh.

You have no idea how they would fair the whole season as a feature back. The evidence says they would be pretty good, but you can't say a player's better based on hypothetical situations.

Producing more and having better physical traits doesn't just magically make you better than the other guy. However, it's entirely rational, and fair for the guy that does to be heralded and celebrated as the best. It's just plain wrong to give credit based on ifs and buts.

No matter how likely it is, you can't give credit based on the unkown. It's not fair to the players who have actually done it. That's just how it works.

It's not like the scouts listen to ESPN, buy one of those scouting magazines

in the offseason and I'm sure Willams/Stewart will be the cream of the crop.

But you don't deserve to go to the probowl, be an All Pro, or a HoFer just because of how good you COULD be or what you WOULD do under certain circumstances.

Okay, AP might not have a back up like Jstew and Dwill, But what they do have is a QB

Everyone who plays carolina are not at all concernd about the pass game ( this year anyway ) Deangelo and Jonathan had to run into 9 and even 10 man boxes, and still put up better YPC then AP.

Not to mention Deangelo was hurt at the end of the year and Jonathan took the whole load on like AP does, and brought his YPC up from 4.6 to 5.1 or something, all in all AP is no where near the skill level double trouble are :o.

And anytime AP breaks a big run it's either pass the next play or hes on the sideline catching his breathe so i understand the whole fresh legs thing but in reality it's not like AP is gasping for air when hes in the huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...