Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vincent, Bernedeau, or Robinson?


capfolly

Recommended Posts

What do you think happens at the RG position next year? Keydrick Vincent will be a FA once the FA period starts. Has he played well enough for the FO to resign him? Mckenzy Bernadeau played well at LG but Travelle Wharton will be back once Gross heals up. And Although Duke hasn't had much playing time, alot of people think he is a sleeper once he gets the chance.

Who do you think goes into camp as the starter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vincent. I don't see them tampering with continuity.

Bernadeau essentially proved he can be Geoff Hangartner's successor. The team prefers to keep at least one "utility" guy who can play multiple spots. That's his role now.

Robinson will get a chance to show what he can do. Could he conceivably prove to be a younger option and displace Vincent? Maybe, but I don't think they go into camp looking for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think happens at the RG position next year? Keydrick Vincent will be a FA once the FA period starts. Has he played well enough for the FO to resign him? Mckenzy Bernadeau played well at LG but Travelle Wharton will be back once Gross heals up. And Although Duke hasn't had much playing time, alot of people think he is a sleeper once he gets the chance.

Who do you think goes into the offseason as the starter?

I suspect keeping or releasing Vincent will be a function of what he costs to re-sign. With no cap we don't have to limit how much we spend within reason. No doubt Bernadeau and Duke will be back. Thet are still on their rookie contracts and are cheap.

I expect that right guard will be another one of those positions where there is plenty of competition this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I didn't throw him in at RG/he didn't win, maybe. We do need to come up with a cheap youngster at LT, though maybe they see Garry Williams as that guy (and the track record suggests if he is, he's worth it). We don't need a bigtime guy at OT, just a solid backup. Schwartz could be that. I don't think they'd ever see it as anyone but Wharton backing LT, though. Schwartz obviously earned the right to be that backup RT. I just think he's as able as anyone to play the RG spot too. My only concern would be making sure he can keep his pad level low.

With Kalil's contract slowly nearing completion, Bernadeau's status as a permanent guard might not be unclear. I don't think they'd have a problem putting him at center if they needed, and unlike Hangartner, Montgomery, or Hartwig, he has the power Kalil does.

I don't see Vincent coming back personally. Down the stretch, with two seventh rounders on the line, he was still the worst of what we had. Missed blocks, holds. Plus with three bigtime contracts, and hopefully one at C soon as well, even the difference between cheaper vet salary and young players can be a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I didn't throw him in at RG/he didn't win, maybe. We do need to come up with a cheap youngster at LT, though maybe they see Garry Williams as that guy (and the track record suggests if he is, he's worth it). We don't need a bigtime guy at OT, just a solid backup. Schwartz could be that. I don't think they'd ever see it as anyone but Wharton backing LT, though. Schwartz obviously earned the right to be that backup RT. I just think he's as able as anyone to play the RG spot too. My only concern would be making sure he can keep his pad level low.

With Kalil's contract slowly nearing completion, Bernadeau's status as a permanent guard might not be unclear. I don't think they'd have a problem putting him at center if they needed, and unlike Hangartner, Montgomery, or Hartwig, he has the power Kalil does.

I don't see Vincent coming back personally. Down the stretch, with two seventh rounders on the line, he was still the worst of what we had. Missed blocks, holds. Plus with three bigtime contracts, and hopefully one at C soon as well, even the difference between cheaper vet salary and young players can be a difference.

The way Schwartz was getting ripped by Magazu in minicamp I wasn't sure he was even going to make the team. That was, of course, pretty early in the process though.

Agree that as long as Gross and Wharton are here, Wharton likely remains the backup LT.

I still think Vincent goes in as the starter next year, but it wouldn't be a huge surprise to see him transitioned out. I pinned a load of the early line troubles on him but thought he got better down the stretch (could have been lingering injury issues).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had to get rid of one guy I suspect it would be Vincent, he isn't under contract and even at a vet minimum will cost around 720,000. One thing the Panthers have shown is that they can develop offensive linemen and salvage guys from the scrap heap. It is unclear how much Vincent's struggles in 2009 were due to a lingering injury issue. I also doubt we will sign him for longer than 1 year so it is possible he might get a better offer elsewhere. I suspect they won't jump to make a deal so it will be interesting to see whether he gets any looks from other teams once free agency begins. We have shown that we won't get in a bidding war for offensive linemen backups so we might lose him to someone else before we decide what to do with him. At 31 we might not think he has much tread left on the tires and will opt for a youth movement at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The contract thing does make a difference, granted. I may be putting too much import on Fox's tendency to favor veterans at certain spots. Capped or uncapped season could also come into play.

Still, I think they might rather have Bernadeau as the utility guy. If not Vincent, maybe Robinson does get the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...