Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If....I mean when we make it to Tampa......


#1panthergurl

Recommended Posts

I was going to just tailgate at the 2003 Superbowl (before my wife got me tickets). I am so glad I went to the game. The week leading up was a huge disappointment.

The NFL Experience was geared to kids 8-14.

All of the parties were over $150 to get in the door.

They did have stuff downtown Houston at night, but it was so expensive and crowded that it was not worth it.

I would never go back without tix for the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no tailgating around the stadiums during Superbowls. You'll have to find someplace else to have your tailgate

I went down to Tampa the last time that they had the SB (2001) for the Giants/Ravens game. There was all kinds of tailgaiting south of the stadium, but those lots were filled by 11am.

We ended up tailgating North of the stadium in Al Lopez Park. Didn't make it into the game, but it sure was a blast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went down to Tampa the last time that they had the SB (2001) for the Giants/Ravens game. There was all kinds of tailgaiting south of the stadium, but those lots were filled by 11am.

We ended up tailgating North of the stadium in Al Lopez Park. Didn't make it into the game, but it sure was a blast.

There will be places to tailgate off stadium property, not on. Never is.

And to answer phidelt649 - NFL pretty much takes over the property for parking of charters, limos, official tailgates where you have to buy tickets to attend, entertainment, etc. Plus, security reasons as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...