Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vince Wilfork has been tagged.

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on February 22, 2010 1:25 PM ET

Thumbnail image for V. Wilfork.jpgRecently tagged Patriots defensive tackle Vince Wilfork can still field contract offers from other teams, but the cost of acquiring him will be prohibitive.

ESPNBoston's Mike Reiss writes that Wilfork received the non-exclusive version of the franchise tag. That means any team that signs Wilfork to an offer sheet must be willing to give up two first-round picks for him. (Not to mention a huge salary.)

In the unlikely scenario that Wilfork signs an offer sheet, the Patriots would have seven days to match the offer or choose to take the two first-round picks.

Essentially, Wilfork will be as difficult to move during the offseason as he is on Sundays. (As the picture above shows.)

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/22/wilforks-tag-is-non-exclusive/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

i'd rather build at DT through the draft anyway. we already have depth from free agency/trades... i'm hoping we'll keep a couple of them as backups and get somebody in the first or second round.

(read: i'm hoping we find a way to get a first round pick in the first place)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i'd rather build at DT through the draft anyway. we already have depth from free agency/trades... i'm hoping we'll keep a couple of them as backups and get somebody in the first or second round.

(read: i'm hoping we find a way to get a first round pick in the first place)

uh-oh. how do you suggest we do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • carpanfan96
      Another Win

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • kungfoodude
      Off Season Thread

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • MillionDollarCam
      Off Season Thread

      By MillionDollarCam · Posted

      I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...