Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about RFA'S


panther4life

Recommended Posts

This may be a dumb question so i apoligize in advance if so but say a team signs a restricted free agent...i'll use richard marshall as an example, if he gets signed by another team for what year will we get the 2nd rd pick, for the 2011 draft?? surely not this years draft right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a dumb question so i apoligize in advance if so but say a team signs a restricted free agent...i'll use richard marshall as an example, if he gets signed by another team for what year will we get the 2nd rd pick, for the 2011 draft?? surely not this years draft right??

teams have to give up 2010 picks for RFAs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:confused:

Other, smaller leagues are going to look very attractive if they don't hammer out a new CBA.

It'll be like when Herschel Walker and doug Flutie decided to enter the USFL draft instead of the NFL draft.

Great job fuging that league up, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, could teams opt to agree to tenders involving future draft picks beyond 2011(not sure on that myself)? For instance, using the Marshall example, could Team A offer his tender and we accept only if the pick given is round 2 2012?

If not, then it's for next year with or without a lockout.

If a team has an interest in an RFA and has a deal worked out in principle, they do have the option to go to the team that tendered the player and work out a deal (ie, when Schaub went to Houston, the Texans approached the Falcons and the teams agreed to a deal that sent Schaub to HOU for 2nd round picks that year and the next)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone tenders Marshall and we flat out agree to not match the offer, we get their second round pick in April's draft... Compensation for losing a RFA is made in this year's draft, not another year...

In Fiz's original post, I think he meant 2011...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To finish this thread...

If Marshall gets an offer and we do not match it, we get that team's second rounder in April.

Sure, we could then match the offer and agree to trade Marshall to that team for further compensation, but that would be a sign and trade, and not an RFA (Marshall) leaving because of RFA tender rules.

There will be a draft in 2011, even if there isn't NFL football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has improved each season, fwiw, statistically.  His slope is rising.  (Not to say I am high on him--I am not, but I have not given up on him--nor have I given up on XL, but damn he pisses me off)  CJ's slope is descending.   I was never a Penix fan.  Never, I say!    
    • That is definitely the down side of all this--on paper, I would offer up a second rounder for him if he passed my interviews.  He has already gone through (seriously?) a treatment program for gambling addiction.  I just see him as a first round talent that we could get with a second rounder.  If I liked Bryce and felt good about paying him $50m per, I would not touch Sorsby.  If Bryce regresses or stays the same--he is going to expect to be paid.  Sorsby, in my view, has a better long-term future as an NFL QB.  He is big, mobile, has good arm strength, and makes wise decisions (on the field) with the football.  He is a great dual threat, RPO QB.   I think he is a perfect solution for the backup qb position and insurance for Bryce should he get injured or suck.  Pickett?  King?  yikes. 
    • Hard to say--they are very unpredictable--this article came out last night---after our comments:  (ESPN)   How has the NFL approached NCAA players with gambling violations in the past? David Purdum, sports betting reporter: Quarterback Hunter Dekkers and wide receiver Kayshon Boutte were found to have committed gambling violations while playing college football, and both were allowed to pursue NFL careers. Dekkers was the projected starting quarterback at Iowa State but was ruled ineligible ahead of the 2023 season after an investigation found he had bet on at least one game involving the Cyclones (among other wagers that violated NCAA bylaws). The bet was just $15 on Iowa State to beat Oklahoma State in a 2021 game in which he did not play, but it led to the end of his Division I career. He played one season at Iowa Western Community College in 2024 before signing with the Saints as an undrafted free agent, and he spent last season on the practice squad. Boutte was arrested in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in January 2024 on charges of underage betting while at LSU. The arrest came roughly eight months after he had been drafted in Round 6 by the Patriots, and the charges were ultimately dropped. According to police, Boutte placed more than 8,900 wagers from April 2022 to May 2023, including betting on at least 17 college football games -- at least six of which involved LSU during that span. The NFL did not discipline Boutte.
×
×
  • Create New...