Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hockey Bets


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

With korpisalo?

They are starting Igor again instead of Quick. Knowing they get a break they are playing their playoff starter again. When in reality Quick is more than capable of handling the senators. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

You really think the redwings, oilers and kings will all win by exactly 2?

The most common winning margins in hockey are 1 and 2, I don't fully expect them too no but with the fact nhl teams pull there goalies when down 1 or 2 makes the actual chances much better and if the earlier games and picks hit they will also start offering cashout real early given the winning amount, say the the first three early ones hit they will probably offer a 20k cashout or more.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Redwings and kings I could get behind. Oilers are gonna kill the sharks even if they are resting everyone. 

The Sharks are actually 1-1 in their season series with the sharks, and I have to say I've watched the last 4 sharks games betting agaist them and they have played much better than I expected and even killed a bet of mine by beating the Kraken. With the Oilers resting I think it stays a 2-3 goal loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

The most common winning margins in hockey are 1 and 2, I don't fully expect them too no but with the fact nhl teams pull there goalies when down 1 or 2 makes the actual chances much better and if the earlier games and picks hit they will also start offering cashout real early given the winning amount, say the the first three early ones hit they will probably offer a 20k cashout or more.

Welp here goes nothing! Might do one with Edmonton total over and spread over too. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...