Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hockey Bets


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Don’t underestimate the Canadians… they’ve been sniping playoff teams for the past month. 

I know i just thought Detroit would actually play some defense and give a better effort than that with it all on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Today's pick will be much simpler 

To win 

Washington 

Carolina 

Vegas

I ain’t counting Philly out. I also want the pens v rags though. I think the pens provide the biggest actually challenge to the rags. Washington would beat the rags up sure. But pens are much better right now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I ain’t counting Philly out. I also want the pens v rags though. I think the pens provide the biggest actually challenge to the rags. Washington would beat the rags up sure. But pens are much better right now. 

I'm hedging it with that flipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2024 at 4:44 PM, Harbingers said:

What are we thinking boys? Gotta have Austin Matthews with a goal which also probably means he’ll be over on shots. No way he isn’t closing the season out without 70 if he plays. 

I didn't feel super confident in much seeing as team effort would be hard to gauge I ended up betting over on all the lines and I've already hit the first two legs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I had the late games. The pens fugged me. 

Eeesh luckily I picked the over on them if they had been alive still I think they play harder and that's a 4-2 or 5-3 pens win...  I think the Canes take the Isles out in four or five games....  Yea we had some low scoring Games in the past but this season we just have too much firepower for them to compete couple that with having Freddie for round one (yay first time) they will struggle to score and if we get 3 goals I don't see them being able to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Who you got tonight?

Still trying to decide the only one I'm sure of so far is Wild -1.5 the rest depend on what lineups,

 

If they all don't rest I'm gonna go

Puck lines (these two are jockeying for postion)

Knights

Kings 

Flames

Wild 

 

They are all facing bad teams that they have owned this year... 

And I've already won covers on every one of the matchups with the same teams so....

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...