Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hockey Bets


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

Honestly with how the playoffs are and excluding the aves/Jets if you believe a team is gonna cover -1.5 you should be betting on them in the goal races because if they are covering 95% of the time they are winning those too draftkings is the only sportsbook that let's you bet it like this because they are very contingent events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Here’s what I’ve looked in tonight.

- Oilers ML boosted to -120

- 2 leg parlay, Oilers and Canes ML at +132

- Bonus bet 3 leg SGP, 76ers +7, 76ers over 98.5, Tobias Harris over 9.5 pts. at +200

- Bonus bet 3 leg SGP, Canes ML, under 6.5 goals, Aho over 2.5 shots at +275

I went a little ham here because I think the over Bruins/Leafs with swayman starting at 5.5 is an easy buy....

Same for oilers kings....

 

 

Screenshot_20240422_171650_FanDuel Sportsbook.jpg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PantherChris said:

My grand parlay of the day, the Canes and Bruins accomplished all of these in the first game and I have a feeling the oilers will! Deff worth the $100 max bet for the potential payout.

Screenshot_20240422_141718.jpg

Screenshot_20240422_141724.jpg

I don’t do sports gambling, so I’m a bit confused from the screenshots but see your betting $100 for a chance at $9k+. Just curious how it works, could you brake it down for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Popsickle said:

I don’t do sports gambling, so I’m a bit confused from the screenshots but see your betting $100 for a chance at $9k+. Just curious how it works, could you brake it down for me?

With Parlays you have to get every leg right.... the bet I placed here the lowest odds of me winning any individual leg is the Bruins to win by 1.5 at plus 180.... bet 100$ to win $180....for a total payout of $280.... well what a parlay does is it takes the best odds and rolls them sequentially into the next bet let's say just for kicks that I'm using the bruins at -1.5 as the first rollover it's going to take the $280 I won and roll it into the next leg, let's say that's the Canes at -1.5 for +114 the payout on that is $599.60  and this continues for all of the legs!

 

*and if you have the ability to bet on things that have a degree of contingency your actual odds are a bit better hence the goal races because the work towards the over and the puck line.

Edited by PantherChris
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

With Parlays you have to get every leg right.... the bet I placed here the lowest odds of me winning any individual leg is the Bruins to win by 1.5 at plus 180.... bet 100$ to win $180....for a total payout of $280.... well what a parlay does is it takes the best odds and rolls them sequentially into the next bet let's say just for kicks that I'm using the bruins at -1.5 as the first rollover it's going to take the $280 I won and roll it into the next leg, let's say that's the Canes at -1.5 for +114 the payout on that is $599.60  and this continues for all of the legs!

 

*and if you have the ability to bet on things that have a degree of contingency your actual odds are a bit better hence the goal races because the work towards the over and the puck line.

So you need all 11 events to happen to win?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Here’s what I’ve looked in tonight.

- Oilers ML boosted to -120

- 2 leg parlay, Oilers and Canes ML at +132

- Bonus bet 3 leg SGP, 76ers +7, 76ers over 98.5, Tobias Harris over 9.5 pts. at +200

- Bonus bet 3 leg SGP, Canes ML, under 6.5 goals, Aho over 2.5 shots at +275

- Oilers up 1-0, need a win for the ML

- 2 leg parlay still in play after the Canes comeback.

- 76ers bonus bet cashed

- Canes bonus bet came up short due to the under

If the Oilers win I’ll be happy going 3-1 tonight.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

- Oilers up 1-0, need a win for the ML

- 2 leg parlay still in play after the Canes comeback.

- 76ers bonus bet cashed

- Canes bonus bet came up short due to the under

If the Oilers win I’ll be happy going 3-1 tonight.

You go spread on the 76ers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...