Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Mock Drafts with Trade Up Scenarios...


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

I was very cold towards trading up for a long while but after listening to the FO comment on our younger players I'm starting to warm up to the idea of losing some picks if it gets us a difference maker. With as many veterans we cut we're still only 1-2 players from the playoffs. The only glaring needs are WR and DE.

So here are some scenarios...

Trade next year's 1st, this year's 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for Eagles/Ravens 1st and 2nd. I feel like this is plausible because the Eagles love to trade down and I'm sure the Raven's wouldn't mind getting their 3rd and 4th back.

1st - Golden Tate - WR/RS - would provide an instant upgrade and a strong 3 WR set. The Smoke route makes a comeback.

2nd - Jermaine Cunningham - DE - pass rush specialist

6th - Armanti Edwards - QB - can't resist.

6thc - Joe Hawley - C - a versatile late round O-lineman? I'm pretty sure it's in the rules somewhere that we have to draft him.

6thc - Dennis Landolt - OT - see above.

7th - Josh Hull - MLB - having a Penn State LB for ST would be nice.

7thc - Robert Malone - P - it's a very shallow draft for kickers but a decent one for punters. Maybe he can do kickoffs?

Trade next year's 1st and this year's 2nd and 6th to New England at #22. The rape and pillaging continues as New England will have 4 2nd round picks in a deep 2010 draft and 3 1st rounders in 2011. Seems plausible.

1st - Everson Griffen - DE - a great DE for us. Mocks have all the top DE's all over the place so insert your favorite DE here as long as he's not named Jason Pierre Paul.

3rd - Mardy Gilyard - WR/RS - again it's hard to know where all of these WR's are going to go. It's a deep WR class so you have a pool of about 5 guys that we could draft here.

4th - Jeremy Williams - WR - we're attacking our glaring needs hard which is the attitude you need when trading up.

6thc - Joe Hawley - C

6thc - Dennis Landolt - OT

7th - Josh Hull - MLB

7thc - Robert Malone - P

I'd love some feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possibility if gilyard is hone in the third is Andre Roberts. I would love to have griffin or Brandon Graham both of whom have the potential to fall into the second round. It will be interesting to see who is still available after that first night...it will go a long way in determining what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hate the 1st option - that seems like we are giving up a lot. honestly i would be happy if we didnt trade up and just work with what we have. go into next year with a clean slate.

We SHOULDNT have to trade up each year. We pay out scouts to find good players in later rounds so you dont need to have high picks to build a good team.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

all i heard was BLAH BLAH BLAH YOUR WRONG haha.

actually i find all these draft screnarios very interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

I don't make these scenarios so much to promote the actions but mostly just to give a good example of what it would look like. It's easier to see how you feel about it once you actually see it worked out.

After doing these I realized I wouldn't pull my hair out if we sold the farm for a DE & WR. We don't really have that many holes so we don't need a ton of high draft picks.

Oh yeah and if you ever got the idea that we have clashed about anything then I wouldn't worry about it because I don't feel that way. Nothing wrong with disagreeing with somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...