Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Mock Drafts with Trade Up Scenarios...


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

I was very cold towards trading up for a long while but after listening to the FO comment on our younger players I'm starting to warm up to the idea of losing some picks if it gets us a difference maker. With as many veterans we cut we're still only 1-2 players from the playoffs. The only glaring needs are WR and DE.

So here are some scenarios...

Trade next year's 1st, this year's 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for Eagles/Ravens 1st and 2nd. I feel like this is plausible because the Eagles love to trade down and I'm sure the Raven's wouldn't mind getting their 3rd and 4th back.

1st - Golden Tate - WR/RS - would provide an instant upgrade and a strong 3 WR set. The Smoke route makes a comeback.

2nd - Jermaine Cunningham - DE - pass rush specialist

6th - Armanti Edwards - QB - can't resist.

6thc - Joe Hawley - C - a versatile late round O-lineman? I'm pretty sure it's in the rules somewhere that we have to draft him.

6thc - Dennis Landolt - OT - see above.

7th - Josh Hull - MLB - having a Penn State LB for ST would be nice.

7thc - Robert Malone - P - it's a very shallow draft for kickers but a decent one for punters. Maybe he can do kickoffs?

Trade next year's 1st and this year's 2nd and 6th to New England at #22. The rape and pillaging continues as New England will have 4 2nd round picks in a deep 2010 draft and 3 1st rounders in 2011. Seems plausible.

1st - Everson Griffen - DE - a great DE for us. Mocks have all the top DE's all over the place so insert your favorite DE here as long as he's not named Jason Pierre Paul.

3rd - Mardy Gilyard - WR/RS - again it's hard to know where all of these WR's are going to go. It's a deep WR class so you have a pool of about 5 guys that we could draft here.

4th - Jeremy Williams - WR - we're attacking our glaring needs hard which is the attitude you need when trading up.

6thc - Joe Hawley - C

6thc - Dennis Landolt - OT

7th - Josh Hull - MLB

7thc - Robert Malone - P

I'd love some feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possibility if gilyard is hone in the third is Andre Roberts. I would love to have griffin or Brandon Graham both of whom have the potential to fall into the second round. It will be interesting to see who is still available after that first night...it will go a long way in determining what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hate the 1st option - that seems like we are giving up a lot. honestly i would be happy if we didnt trade up and just work with what we have. go into next year with a clean slate.

We SHOULDNT have to trade up each year. We pay out scouts to find good players in later rounds so you dont need to have high picks to build a good team.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

all i heard was BLAH BLAH BLAH YOUR WRONG haha.

actually i find all these draft screnarios very interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we've kind of clashed viewpoints so far about Panthers draft strategy, and I'd have to disagree again...

This draft is talent (bang for your buck, so to speak) heavy in the middle rounds, and while I would love to move up and get Tate above anyone else, I'm afraid we wouldn't give up so much to do so...

I'm still betting we'll move up with KC or someone else at the top of the second for either a WR we really want (Tate could very well slide this far) or a defensive guy that slides... All it would take is next year's first and we could possibly flip flop 4th rounders to sweeten the deal, and get a 5th rounder out of the trade partner too...

Again, that is just my opinion... But I think we'll look more into acquiring more picks in the 4th round harder than we will look to move into the first...

I appreciate your analysis though, and wouldn't be mad if it worked out this way...

I don't make these scenarios so much to promote the actions but mostly just to give a good example of what it would look like. It's easier to see how you feel about it once you actually see it worked out.

After doing these I realized I wouldn't pull my hair out if we sold the farm for a DE & WR. We don't really have that many holes so we don't need a ton of high draft picks.

Oh yeah and if you ever got the idea that we have clashed about anything then I wouldn't worry about it because I don't feel that way. Nothing wrong with disagreeing with somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...