Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I need a new team


Claws

Recommended Posts

the marlins! got a new stadium coming, 2 of the best young players in baseball (hanley ramirez, josh johnson) they are both locked into long contracts, and we are finally keeping out players after two consecutive winning seasons!

plus we have 2 world titles since our creation in 1993 :D

okay, okay, it's a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both the Giants and Rangers.

Giants have some good young guys like Lincecum, Cain and Kung Fu Panda that I like to watch.

I have always like the Rangers (goes back to Nolan Ryan) and they have a lot of good young talent and can be really good if that young pitching staff becomes consistant. I just hate that their manager is a recently admitted coke head and is still the manager after saying it was his first time using (at age 50 something).

In all honesty though.....stay with your Cubs...it will be that much sweeter when they do win a championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants.

There are a few Huddlers out here in Cali that could help guide your induction to the dark side...

Well i do have family out there. I've actually been to SBC and it is absolutely beautiful. It wouldn't be a hard fit for me.

The Rangers are so close to home and we go down there a couple times a year.

And thanks for laughing Salt!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want it to be easy, then just pick a winner and get it over with ffs. Let me make it easy for you.

Yankees, Lakers, Patriots, Red Wings.

There you are set.

Lol

Not quite. I hate the Lakers, Pats and Red Wings. Yankees? Jury's out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...