Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interested in Jason Campbell

Kevin Greene

By Kevin Greene,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Samuel L. Jackson Newbie

Samuel L. Jackson

Posted
Posted

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted

I am all for bringin in Campbell.............. He is not that bad as people think. He is a good option to have on the roster and compete. Lets not forget the two lost season the past three because all the Panthers had was Jake. Having to many QB's on the roster that can start is never a bad thing. And if Moore crumbles or cant beat out Campbell than he doesnt deserve to be the starter. Many people complained Jake never had a QB on the roster pushing him so lets not make the same mistake with Moore.

I am ALL for bringing in Campbell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...

you love to gloat dont you?lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

edit- and I'm not saying Campbell is bad, I think he's had a rough tenure playing for the Skins behind a bad offensive line and a constantly changing offense.. but I just don't understand why people can't trust Moore. He's done just about everything he could possibly do to prove he's ready for the starting job. Gotta give the guy a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Nothing says "faith in Matt Moore" and wanting to make sure he's not looking over his shoulder than bringing in a young guy that's been a starter for several years elsewhere.

This would be a very stupid move, so I fully expect it to happen.

It would be a very SMART move.

Just because you have faith in a QB does not mean that you do not have a solid and able back-up. Doing THAT would be a stupid move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

He will get moved for SIGNIFICANTLY less than his tender. I say he moves for no more than a 4th round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samuel L. Jackson Newbie

Samuel L. Jackson

Posted
Posted

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

It isn't that I don't like Marshall or anything like that...

I see it as this...

Richard Marshall is a great nickel corner... But he leaves a little to be desired as a starter... Ron Meeks' system had a lot more to do with our pass defense ranking than Richard Marshall...

Plus, I think we want to draft a CB in the 3rd or 4th round, or give Munnerlyn or Martin a shot at moving into the #2 spot... We invested a lot in Martin just for him to come in and be a backup FS... Just saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We won, but Bryce and Canalas still blow

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Do you honestly believe this is a team that will even be in contention for a playoff spot this year? To me, if you're not at minimum a genuine playoff caliber team, every win you get is a meaningless win in the end.  This is the NFL, it's not peewee league where you just want to win a few games and have fun, you want to get into the playoffs and have a shot at making a SB run. We haven't had a winning season in how many years?   Does "enjoying" a small handful of wins every year really make for an enjoyable season for you? I said it months ago and I'll say it forever, I don't care about winning or losing this year, as we don't have a playoff caliber roster yet and I'm a realist about where we are as a franchise.  I'd enjoy watching the games so much more if the team and Bryce in particular were just showing marked improvement, even if it came in losses.   Because THAT would give me hope for the future of the franchise and the direction we're going. Bryce was complete garbage in Week 1, in Week 2 he was terrible until the Cardinals went into super soft prevent defense and then collapsed gain when the game was in reach, and he was a serviceable game manager today, but didn't make any throws that any college QB couldn't make. This game was a perfect chance to let Bryce go out there and play loose because of the lead, just let him be himself and see if it sparks his college self.  But instead, we went unbelievably conservative with the play calling to help ensure the win, when actual wins and losses are the least of our worries this year, it's figuring out what Bryce can be (fans may be decided, but the team obviously has not yet).
    • GoobyPls
      baker mayfield takes shot at steve wilks over their carolina days

      By GoobyPls · Posted

      I’m pretty sure Baker requested to be released. 
    • strato
      We won, but Bryce and Canalas still blow

      By strato · Posted

      Pretty fair assessment overall. I can’t say a lot since I didn’t watch but going by the comments I am betting he (Canales) was very conservative and a large reason would be to prevent Bryce giving it away half the day. 
×
×
  • Create New...