Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What about Clayton?


Recommended Posts

Source: Baltimore Sun

The Ravens are expected to shop Mark Clayton if they select a receiver early in the draft.

They may shop him regardless. Clayton will battle Donte' Stallworth for the third receiver job and may be left out of the rotation altogether. Due to hit unrestricted free agency in 2011, the Ravens might as well get what they can for him now.

Clayton's Stats from last year

Games- 14

Receptions- 34

Yards- 480

Average Yards Per Catch- 14.1

Long- 54

Touchdowns- 2

Would you trade a late round pick or a back-up for Mark Clayton? If so then what would you trade for him?

By the way he would have to switch numbers. He ain't no 89.

medium.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

meh. not sure it's necessary if we draft some wrs. besides, like that other dude said, i'd love for them to sign holt to a one year deal. that won't happen either though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats why said it. was trying to be sarcastic. In every thread I read someone will always say "let's trade for him for a 5th".

Yeap and its amazing how every player available for trade should be a Panther. The only player that has been traded that we should have been a part of was Holmes. Marshall wasn't worth the contract, Boldin was on the wrong side of 30, and Ginn wasn't worth a 5th. Clayton definitely isn't worth one he brings no value as a receiver or returner. I wouldn't mind him as a reclamation project but only for a min contract and no picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

Yeap and its amazing how every player available for trade should be a Panther. The only player that has been traded that we should have been a part of was Holmes. Marshall wasn't worth the contract, Boldin was on the wrong side of 30, and Ginn wasn't worth a 5th. Clayton definitely isn't worth one he brings no value as a receiver or returner. I wouldn't mind him as a reclamation project but only for a min contract and no picks.

Wow, really you just bash every single player that is brought up. It's the offseason bro, were not going to sit around and talk about rape cases, {Oh wait, were doing that to, Thanks BIG BEN}. It is just something to talk about. If you don't like it don't look at it.

Now hop off my nuts.

Link to comment

I would rather have T. Holt.

Me too for a one year cheap rental that doesn't involve picks. Draft a guy like Jacoby Ford or Riley Cooper and get a guy like Holt and between them and Jarret and Moore someone should become a solid #2 with some good depth and potential behind them. Personally no matter who we draft or bring in I think Jarret will be our #2 at least for the 1st 1/2 of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...