Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spread Offense


DirtyMagic97

Recommended Posts

Guest silver82blade

it does, very well. don't the patriots use it? i recall one game a few years ago where the packers used 4 or 5 receivers most of the game and passed at will over some team. i wish we would tailor our team to it. the more options an offense has, the less chance the defense will key into what they're doing and stop it. it takes a great qb and a deep receiving group, but as long as you have that then you're golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speed of the athletes. In college your 3rd n 4th WR is usually better than the 3rd n 4th CB. In the NFL LB's are just as fast as WR's

See I agree to some extent. Though, I've seen our LB's get beaten by receivers a few times. I just think if you get the ball in the hands of your speed players even just 3 yards down the field, it can turn in to a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

spread plays do not take a lot of time to develop. the qb is usually already in the shotgun, and he'll pass to an underneath receiver if he's open. also, nfl lbs are not as fast as wrs. maybe thomas davis can hang with some receivers, but not the typical lb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spread plays do not take a lot of time to develop. the qb is usually already in the shotgun, and he'll pass to an underneath receiver if he's open. also, nfl lbs are not as fast as wrs. maybe thomas davis can hang with some receivers, but not the typical lb.

Yep. The key in pass-happy spreads is getting the ball away from the QB and into the hands of the playmakers. If we had a few quick guys, a spread system could work.

Wes Welker says your LB can't cover him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...