Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The best thing about this board is seeing people cry NO MATTER WHO THE PANTHERS TAKE.


SmootsDaddy89

Recommended Posts

LaFell in the third was awesome.

Edwards. . .maybe a bit of a reach. But he has the same attitude that a guy like Steve Smith has.

And keep this in mind as well. If we traded up to draft Tate in the first, you guys would be shitting yourselves with excitement, but he didn't go until 60th overall. We would have reached majorly and not have even had any idea. The bottom line is that you DON'T KNOW when a player would have gone if you didn't pick them

Edwards would have been taken in the third or early fourth simply due to his athleticism alone, but who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like watching people shift gears as we draft.

"Haha clausen sucks, eat poo"

1 hour later..

"STFU Clausen is a FRANCHISE QB haha Moore sucks"

At least have the nuts to keep the same opinion for more than 30 hours at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus Edwards can be the 3rd string QB instead of Cantwell. So we dont have to carry 3 QBs. Edwards college stats were much better than Cantwell's. Plus we have alot more special teams guys that have more value for our team than a 3rd string QB that will never see the field most likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...