Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

YES!!! What We've All Been Waiting For! Rookie Jersey Numbers Are Up!


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Guest silver82blade

eric norwood #92? they have him listed at defensive end. do linebackers ever have 90 numbers? i want him at linebacker!!!!!!! noooooooooo. what's going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate 70 numbers on defensive ends.

(the 90s are all taken, though some of those guys may not last)

Kinda glad Claussen didn't take #17. That would have been weird.

Nick Hayden is 98?! kick his a$$ out and give it to Hardy, 76 sucks. (why am i getting so excited over #'s. and Hilee Taylor is still on the team? what a waste of #97

Yeah, hence my "ick" following that one... I really hate DLs, DE's especially, with #'s in the 70s... Only exception I might make is 75 is kind of sick b/c of Howie Long. But, that's pushing it. Hardy would do a lot better rocking that #97 or #98.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't put a lot in of weight in Norwood's listing as a DE, except that he's also wearing #92... The other day the roster still listed Armanti as a QB.

That is weird though b/c Fox said in the post-draft presser that although Norwood is versatile and has experience doing both, he plans on starting him out at Sam-backer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be buying custom Jimmy Clausen #2 jerseys or anyone elses just yet. I'm sure quite a few of these will change between now and the start of the season depending on who gets cut and who works out deals for X number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...