Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

20/20 Hindsight: Brown and Goodson worth 2010 2nd round Pick, NOT 1st?


jpniner

Recommended Posts

With hindsight, I think this is the question simply because I think the Panthers with their first rounder this year would've took Claussen anyway so in effect our 2010 Draft looks like this

1st: Claussen (paying 2nd round money)

2nd: Brown and Goodson, but with 1yr NFL experience

3rd: LaFell

3rd(in stupid trade): Edwards

4th: Norwood

6th: Hardy, Gettis, Pugh, Pike

7th: Stanford, McClain

I think its reasonable to conclude that they would've taken Claussen in the First(though perhaps in a trade down, getting another pick?), So if that is true then the above is in effect how the Panthers 2010 Draft ended up. Granted we need "time" to fully say 'was the Brown/Goodson trade worth it" but given this date in time do you think it was worth it???

I think Furney got Liquored up :sifone: after their First Round would be pick, who they tried to trade up into first round and early 2nd round to get also, fell all the way too them and by the end of the night they were Drunk enough to pull the Trigger on the Edwards Trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which we got along with the 2nd rounder we took Brown with for our First Rounder this year.

It was San Frans 2nd and 4th last season for our First This season.

So why are you putting Brown in the 2nd? You should put them both in the 4th.. do you see your logic is flawed? Goodson should go in the 4th. Brown should go in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he wasn't drafted in the 2nd round. therefore he isn't a 2nd round pick. sorry

The Point was that for our First Round Pick, which the Panthers likely would've taken Claussen with anyway, they got Everette Brown AND Mike Goodson.......AND None of these guys are getting paid First Round money!!!!!!

then without that first, Claussen slid all the way to them in the 2nd this year. Thus essentially we got the above list of players for this years draft.

Though you could convince me the Panthers wouldn't have taken Claussen in the 1st this year and would've taken a Defensive stud or WR stud and hoped to get The Golden Calf of Bristol or McCoy in the 2nd?

this is of course an in exact science, but I think Furney got so thrilled(drunk?) it made them trade next years 2nd away for Edwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why are you putting Brown in the 2nd? You should put them both in the 4th.. do you see your logic is flawed? Goodson should go in the 4th. Brown should go in the 2nd.

Ok, if you want to be technical about it.

Point was for the pick we would've probably taken Claussen with most likely, we got Brown AND Goodson.

On the radio all day they talk as if we just got Brown out of the deal and he would've been no better than a 3rd rounder this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Point was that for our First Round Pick, which the Panthers likely would've taken Claussen with anyway, they got Everette Brown AND Mike Goodson

then without that first, Claussen slid all the way to them in the 2nd this year. Thus essentially we got the above list of players for this years draft.

Though you could convince me the Panthers wouldn't have taken Claussen in the 1st this year and would've taken a Defensive stud or WR stud and hoped to get The Golden Calf of Bristol or McCoy in the 2nd?

this is of course an in exact science, but I think Furney got so thrilled(drunk?) it made them trade next years 2nd away for Edwards.

meh, too much maddness for me. i'll pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everette Brown is going to be a stud. He was a first round talent last year and this year. Jimmy Clausen was a first round talent this year. IMO we didn't give up anything because we would have taken Clausen with the 17th pick that we had given to SF. Not to mention we would have had to pay him a 1st round contract. It turned out to be a great move by Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Clausen will get anywhere close to 17th pick money, though I bet he does get more than your average #48 pick of yrs past.

Anyway, In Hurney's view I think he's looking at the value he got out of this deal and money saved and thinking he came out on better end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he's gone, and rightfully so, if he turns in another losing record. The "talented roster," regardless of how true or not, is a double-edged sword. If the roster is so much improved now from 202X then why are you still producing losing seasons? On one hand, maybe that's what needs to happen. Have the GM hire the new coach, and then have the new coach pick his guy to run his system. That is typically how it works in the NFL. Not the forced inheritance deal we have had in place.
    • Hinging on Brooks to be our spark...be good if it happens... but not holding my breath....RB next draft. Morgan gambled...it would be a 2 year payoff if thing happened.
    • Only way Canales is fired is if we are attrocious everywhere....  defense /special teams and offense..  There are enough "questions" on if BY9 is the guy that ownership wouldn't fire the coach for "just" mid qb play.  Especially with as talented a roster that has played "well enough" to win some tough football games and hang in there against the top tier of the NFL ...(mostly).   Now total team suckage..yeah .. but I don't see that happening.   
×
×
  • Create New...