Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

POLL: Who Will Be 2nd WR


Lilsmitty09

2nd WR?  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. 2nd WR?

    • Lafell
      50
    • Jarrett
      63
    • Moore
      2
    • Edwards
      23


Recommended Posts

I think Lafell will show in training camp that he's already as good as, if not better than Jarrett. If Jarrett sticks as the #2 it probably means our other WR's are not as good as advertised and we're going to be screwed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edwards' skill set would likely make him a better slot receiver than Jarrett, so I think he has an advantage for the #3 spot. Jarrett might not get any playing time unless Lafell struggles or gets injured. I can't say I have a problem with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think fox betrays his own tendency to go with seasoned vets and goes with whoever's got the most promise in training camp... i see lafell being that guy, with edwards/jarrett fighting for WR3.

aside from smitty we have no seasoned vet at WR.

lafell's blocking ability will have him on the field as much as moose was. he may not be the best receiver (edwards might end up being better) but his true value comes in being a good receiver and excellent blocker.

i just don't see jarrett getting the starting job across from smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only think Jarrett will be #2 because he did improve last year and showed he can make some athletic catches. Also, we all know how far Fox's loyalties are to some of the starters AND the guys that are supposed to be a big impact (see Colbert, Delhomme, Foster). I believe if Moore keeps on spreadin' the ball around like he has been, all of our receivers will have a chance to get into a groove. Smitty has to step up and be the teacher that he says he wants to be.

Jarrett could be the big physical possession receiver we sorely need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only think Jarrett will be #2 because he did improve last year and showed he can make some athletic catches. Also, we all know how far Fox's loyalties are to some of the starters AND the guys that are supposed to be a big impact (see Colbert, Delhomme, Foster). I believe if Moore keeps on spreadin' the ball around like he has been, all of our receivers will have a chance to get into a groove. Smitty has to step up and be the teacher that he says he wants to be.

Jarrett could be the big physical possession receiver we sorely need.

Yeah, I see it that way too. With Moose gone, I believe he has been most likely working hard this offseason while preparing to be the #2 guy.

The guy has awesome talent... just his production hasn't been shown obviously, but I think that will change this season coming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think either Jarrett or Lafell with easily show their dominance over the other and one will be the other big receiver opposite Smitty. Edwards will be the number three playing either in the slot of lining up where Smitty would and Smitty will be in the slot. Or all Smitty, Lafell, Jarrett at wide reciever, and Edwards in the wildcat. The possibilities are endless.

At the end of the day though, if Jarrett can't block as well as Lafell it might not matter who is a better receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not buying the "Fox loyalty" thing. With all the people we let go this off-season I doubt that blind loyalty to vets will be much of a factor. And with all the draft picks we spent on receivers--obviously in attempt to find a legit #2--if someone (probably Lafell) proves to be as good as or better than Jarrett in camp, they will get the starting job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not buying the "Fox loyalty" thing. With all the people we let go this off-season I doubt that blind loyalty to vets will be much of a factor. And with all the draft picks we spent on receivers--obviously in attempt to find a legit #2--if someone (probably Lafell) proves to be as good as or better than Jarrett in camp, they will get the starting job.

That wasn't up to Fox. It was financial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That wasn't up to Fox. It was financial.

Still, the fact that we invested three draft picks, two of which were pretty high, into receivers indicates that we are trying to replace Jarrett. We wouldn't select three receivers if we were comfortable with Jarrett as the #2. If Lafell shows promise in camp, he'll bump Jarrett. If not in Week 1, probably by Week 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...