Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Network reports Boldin will play


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Just heard a few minutes ago on NFLN that they had a guy at the Cards team hotel last night and the word is that Boldin will play tonight. I know he might be limited but, just his presence is a big deal for their offense.

Regardless, I wouldn't mind Harris coming across and knocking the snot out of him and causing his hammy to suddenly "tighten up." lol

IN CONCLUSION, WE WILL WIN. PERIOD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected him to play but was hoping that he wouldn't... but even seeing when he pulled it against ATL it didn't look that bad as he finished jogging the TD out. That said, it's hard to predict what he will and won't be able to do because trainers on this level can do some amazing things... I hope he will be more of a decoy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im tired of all the b.s and lies

Earlier on ESPN, dude said its not as true as the stories about Boldin practicing seems. It was just a little walk through and nobody knows if he'll play yet

Now NFLN is reporting he will. Cant wait till this is over. Its getting annoying. Somebody doing something just for attention and noise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...