Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RDR or Alan Wake


tarheelblue89

Recommended Posts

Haven't played Alan Wake but RDR is fantastic. Especially if you're into westerns like me. It's got tons of replay value and the game is probably at least 2-3 times longer than Alan Wake (from what I've heard on the length of that game). I'd like to get AW but I'm a little bit put off about the shortness of it....I've heard it's about 10-12 hours. You can put that much time into RDR and not touch most of the main quest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a big western guy at all.

I'm just looking for a game that has a nice story mode. Which I think I would get with RDR, seeing as how I love the GTA games.

Wake's story just looks so fuging cool. That's why I'm having trouble deciding.

It's GTA set in the early 1900's west. I like all the GTA games, but this one is my favorite Rockstar game. But that may be because I love westerns. I don't think you'll be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really wish i liked GTA...if i did, id buy this one.The premise appeals to me more than GTA. I bought GTA4 on the hype, and was immediately, non plus'd. Much like the 1st time i played SIMs after hearing the hype.

ill stick to BF2bc.. i only do one game at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the last time I watched the Pro Bowl was that year Sean Taylor blew up that poor punter. LOL
    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
×
×
  • Create New...