Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortal Kombat


Acewalker

Recommended Posts

Game companies are very hesitant to let old dogs die. Even if I live 100 more years I imagine Mortal Kombat, Sonic, Mario and Street Fighter will still be around. I don't think that they have to keep recreating these games to be successful. Look at Naughty Dog. They abandoned Crash Bandicoot (RIP) and invested in Uncharted. Uncharted has been extremely successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy has this game. The graphics are great, and i was kicking his ass for hours, because i mastered Mortal Kombat years ago, but after a few hours, the "new" feeling wore off, and it felt like i was playing old-school MK again.

I think that the old fighting games have been dying a way too slow death. Companies like Midway and Capcom would be better off to let MK and Street Fighter die off, and instead use they're resources to come up with a new platform.

its the fighting game renaissance. SF and MK were pretty much dead for 10 years or so and they have made tons of new games in between. as for midway though they went bankrupt a couple years ago.

there's a whole lot of ignorance in that post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont like the way I worded that post, it's not really the message i was trying to portray. Mortal Kombat was a great game.

What i meant to say is that the development team should have abandoned the MK story. The game-engine that they used was excellent, but i think they should have used it to make a "new" game, with a new story and new characters. At the bottom of the package, write "from the makers of mortal kombat".

Of course it's just my opinion, but if the game had some new ideas, and not just the same old Shoa Khan, Scorpion and Sub-Zero universe, i probably would have bought it. As the first game on the new platform(PS3)(XBOX360), they could have given the fans something new, and maybe even start a brand-new billion dollar franchise.

To be fair .. The new story is for the most part about 80% altered .. and mk 4 through armageddon never actually had a story it was just every characters take on a "story" So they have actually set thereselves up for a large amount of success...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont like the way I worded that post, it's not really the message i was trying to portray. Mortal Kombat was a great game.

What i meant to say is that the development team should have abandoned the MK story. The game-engine that they used was excellent, but i think they should have used it to make a "new" game, with a new story and new characters. At the bottom of the package, write "from the makers of mortal kombat".

Of course it's just my opinion, but if the game had some new ideas, and not just the same old Shoa Khan, Scorpion and Sub-Zero universe, i probably would have bought it. As the first game on the new platform(PS3)(XBOX360), they could have given the fans something new, and maybe even start a brand-new billion dollar franchise.

its cool :thumbsup:

the reason it seems similar to the old games is because its essentially a revamp or remake of mk3 /mktrilogy

the reason behind it though is because basically every game that has been made after trilogy has been complete crap. they went so far from the original formula that it was pretty much unrecognizable.

it became extremely bloated with awful characters that had things like burps and farts for moves. people wanted a new mk with better graphics, story, and gameplay that stayed true to the arcade era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...