Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jon Beason on ESPN First Take


Swarly

Recommended Posts

It's not his job to pick a QB so he's going to talk both of them up and let the coaches decide like a team captain should.

he was asked about both, and his response on Clausen was much more than Moore in my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

basically..

Peppers: talked about how we're going to have to fill the void. talked up his replacements. said he wishes Peppers the best.

Smitty: asked about what he thought about being injured. said Smith was a competitor and it was just a fluke injury. thinks he'll be fine for the regular season which is all that matters to him.

Moore:

-talked about how good he's been when he has had to take over(back in 2007, and late last year.) said he's the veteran and should get the job.

Clausen:

-said how smart he is, how he's not just going deep and is taking what the defense gives him(checkdowns, etc)

-how he throws a very catchable ball, accurate, etc

then was asked random questions about Soccer, uniforms, etc. nothing important there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...