Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther Selection on 'ESPN's 2010 Top Prospects' a Mild Surprise


SnarkAttack

Recommended Posts

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_position.php?tab=by_position&season=2009&pos=TE&stype=r&runpass=&teamid=5&numsnaps=0&numgames=1

Lets put one myth to bed and that is King is a great blocker and Barnidge sucks. This site did an analysis of play last year and Barnidge was rated the best receiver and best blocker of the three. Guess who was worst. Yeah, Jeff King

Where on that sight do the explain how they come up with those values, I can't find it. I'd like to see it before I really weigh in.

But here a few things that I think might be skewing Barnidge's stats.

Barnidge took signifigantly less snaps, 65% less than King

His YAC is also really, really high. That's to his credit though. He's very fast and can get behind guys, then he's strong enough to finish the play. Still if he gets snaps on a consistent basis and teams start paying more attention I don't know if he could sustain such a high avg. on his catches and YAC.

The 2 games where Barnidge had a lot of snaps were with a completely healthy O-line against Arizona and New Orleans. His next highest game with his snaps was against the Giants. Again, to his credit he could have been apart of these great rushing performances but at the same time we were REALLY clicking on those games. If he were to get more snaps then I think again his avg is going to drop down a bit more.

So I don't really feel like the stats are really telling the whole story. I'd like to see how they grade them though, if I don't know that I can't really weigh in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where on that sight do the explain how they come up with those values, I can't find it. I'd like to see it before I really weigh in.

But here a few things that I think might be skewing Barnidge's stats.

Barnidge took signifigantly less snaps, 65% less than King

His YAC is also really, really high. That's to his credit though. He's very fast and can get behind guys, then he's strong enough to finish the play. Still if he gets snaps on a consistent basis and teams start paying more attention I don't know if he could sustain such a high avg. on his catches and YAC.

The 2 games where Barnidge had a lot of snaps were with a completely healthy O-line against Arizona and New Orleans. His next highest game with his snaps was against the Giants. Again, to his credit he could have been apart of these great rushing performances but at the same time we were REALLY clicking on those games. If he were to get more snaps then I think again his avg is going to drop down a bit more.

So I don't really feel like the stats are really telling the whole story. I'd like to see how they grade them though, if I don't know that I can't really weigh in.

To tell you the truth I don't know how they grade them on everything. I think you can look at the overall but also need to look at the categories to get your analysis. And I sure that you can't seperate the TE from the rest of the line on a running play so there is likely some room for inaccuracy. Still the overal analysis certainly suggests that Barnidge is the best receiver and certainly not a problem blocking to the point that he shouldn't get more reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing how a fan will bring something up on a message board, such as "Fox refuses to play rookies", "the Panthers never throw to TE's", or "every other QB on the Panthers roster spread the ball around more than Delhomme", and the next thing you know, 4-5 other fans agree with it and it becomes an assumed fact by the majority. Yet, when you actually look at the evidence, it turns out that Fox actually does play rookies if they earn it (what a concept), the Panthers do throw it to TE's, and Jake actually spread the ball around just as much as Matt Moore, it just didn't seem that way because the results were different.

Hey man, that is just how we roll.

(I hate it too.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnidge would already be an all pro TE on any other team. Too bad Fox wouldnt know what a good pass catching TE was if it beat up him upside his skull.

Something tells me this year may be different. I'm no Fox fan but he and Davidson have never had real passing game (requires more than just Smitty and Jake). Maybe they will open it up; then again maybe not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...