Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Say Goodbye to Blockbuster in 2011


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

by Monika Bartyzel Jul 13th 2010 // 11:45AM

Blockbuster was once the mecca of rentals. While indie metropolitan stores may have always reigned supreme in terms of stock and scope, Blockbuster was the "it" locale for the rest of the country. It wasn't so long ago when stores would be packed on a Friday evening as people rushed to grab the new releases, and shelves stocked sure-to-be-there bets -- films that weren't guaranteed because no one was going to the store, but because they'd have huge piles of discs.

Now Blockbuster is a movie ghost town. After the onslaught of Netflix and Redbox, the end has been near for a while. The company has managed to hold on, just barely, but financial types are now expecting the end to come in 2011.

Blockbuster is near the top of 24/7 Wall St's new list of brands expected to disappear by the end of 2011. The company is currently considering Chapter 11, and it lost another $65 million last quarter. 6,000 stores are still left, but 24/7 believes that the only life left in the company is the kiosk/delivery rental methods. "Its brick-and-mortar business is dead."

It just goes to show you how much of any movie business relies on the casual moviegoer, not the eager-to-watch-everything cinephile. I always, and wrongly, thought that video stores would stay around for the increased options, the older films, and the immediacy the system awarded. You wouldn't have to plan a night in with friends, they could just head to the local store with you and decide between the old and the new.

With streaming, members were offered the immediacy mail could never provide, popping the last piece into Blockbuster's death puzzle. Netflix-free Canada might have to wait for Blockbuster's death knell to prod zip.ca to rival the 'flix in title options and streaming, but chances are that in the U.S., most folks won't really feel the impact of Blockbuster's death. All the company can hope for is a nice influx of buyers when all of their dvds hit the 5-for-$20 bin.

http://www.cinematical.com/2010/07/13/say-goodbye-to-blockbuster-in-2011/

I haven't bought anything from them in years, don't have any friends that have either, we use redbox. I will be making the trip the discount bin when its closing time though!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Redbox.

Everytime I would try to rent a movie from there either a) they would be out of everything worth watching B) there would be a long line c) the person in front of you would be returning a movie and have the bar code pointed the wrong way and stupidly trying to insert the disk over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Usually though it was a combination of all three, first b, then c, and finally a.

I don't go to blockbuster anymore either but I hate fuging Redbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's so many Redboxes around here, that's generally not a problem for me... unless you go to the ones at Walmart...

I knew BB was gone... we would still rent there every once in a while, but when they went to that $5/5 day thing, that was the last straw... On Demand, Netflix, Redbox and streaming online killed them dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Redbox.

Everytime I would try to rent a movie from there either a) they would be out of everything worth watching B) there would be a long line c) the person in front of you would be returning a movie and have the bar code pointed the wrong way and stupidly trying to insert the disk over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Usually though it was a combination of all three, first b, then c, and finally a.

I don't go to blockbuster anymore either but I hate fuging Redbox.

people must not use it alot here bc they always have what i need. they have it online too. them and netflix are what i use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people must not use it alot here bc they always have what i need. they have it online too. them and netflix are what i use

Netflix and on-demand.

About 2 months ago though, my wife went to Blockbuster to rent some movie. I don't remember what it was but it was probably the first time either one of us had been in a Blockbuster since I had left Guam.

Somehow the little fuger behind the counter talked her into paying $20 for a Blockbuster Rewards card. She came home and was all excited because we got 1 free rental for every 5 rentals and 1 free "old movie" rental a month.

I was not happy. I have since decreed that she is not allowed to go anywhere by herself where they have any type of reward card for sale.

We have reward cards for just about every store on the planet. I am 99% sure that she would be a reward card from a crack dealer on the corner.

"Hey, for $20 I will give you a card that is good for a free 8-ball for every 10 8-balls you purchase!".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Redbox.

Everytime I would try to rent a movie from there either a) they would be out of everything worth watching B) there would be a long line c) the person in front of you would be returning a movie and have the bar code pointed the wrong way and stupidly trying to insert the disk over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Usually though it was a combination of all three, first b, then c, and finally a.

I don't go to blockbuster anymore either but I hate fuging Redbox.

You can go to Redbox.com and reserve a movie at whichever kiosk you use. Not saying they'll have anything, but I check before I go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can go to Redbox.com and reserve a movie at whichever kiosk you use. Not saying they'll have anything, but I check before I go.

Good tip, that would at least eliminate a. If you can think of anything that would eliminate both b and c, beyond walking into the store and laying waste to some dumb mofo's, I will start to use Redbox again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was at Blockbuster today for the first time in a hot one. $9 for video games? wtf. It's only for 5 days too. Not even a week. Their selection was tiny too. Redbox, Gamefly, and the interwebz are murkin off on them.

Other noteable businesses going out next year:

Kia Moters

Reader's Digest - (no homo)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...