Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm posting from my smart phone

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

sunbunny Newbie

sunbunny

Posted
Posted

I want a smartphone. The galaxy just released for t mobile today. But, there's an htc with a keyboard coming out in Sept and another phone code named "emerald" coming out in Nov that's supposed to release with "gingerbread" (rumored to be an lg). I guess I'll hang on to my dumbass a little while longer. I really want a keyboard.

I now know more about t mobile phones than the reps who work in the store here. I went in a week ago to ask about the galaxy (vibrant), and they didn't have a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Veteran

jasonluckydog

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I want a smartphone. The galaxy just released for t mobile today. But, there's an htc with a keyboard coming out in Sept and another phone code named "emerald" coming out in Nov that's supposed to release with "gingerbread" (rumored to be an lg). I guess I'll hang on to my dumbass a little while longer. I really want a keyboard.

I now know more about t mobile phones than the reps who work in the store here. I went in a week ago to ask about the galaxy (vibrant), and they didn't have a clue.

I wouldn't buy...TMOBILE is in danger of going out of business they do not offer 4g and they wont look for them to merge or disappear soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sunbunny Newbie

sunbunny

Posted
Posted

Tmo going out of business is nothing but speculation. I'd string two cans together with string before ever going back to sprint. So far as merging with sprint, the two networks aren't compatible from my understanding.

We're happy with tmo. The customer service has been excellent. They're rolling out new phones left and right. And while not 4g, their HSPA+ network is just as fast as sprints 4g per tests.

We were with sprint for almost 10 years. They raped us for every charge they could. When other carriers were offering free roaming, sprint was still charging. The plans for texting were outrageous. Customer service was a nightmare, and that's if you could understand "bob" on the other end. I hate sprint with a passion and will do without a phone before ever going back to them. The only reason they're so cheap now is because they lost so many customers. Hell, even the restaurant where we used to cater left sprint this year and went with another carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...