Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Upgrade to Adobe Photoshop CS5


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

We've got a license of CS2 and want to go to CS5, I found an upgrade version on Buy.com that's WAY cheaper than the full version, so my question is this... when you install the "upgrade" to CS5, is it essentially just the full version of the new software and you have to have the codes for the old version to activate it, right?

Surely you don't have to install CS2 and then upgrade it to CS5 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the CS5 upgrade is good for CS2, 3, or 4.

I just found out that it is actually "upgrade" software. You have to have CS2 installed and then install the upgrade... oh well, it'll save almost $400 so I'm doing it...

...and yes, this is for a professional use, so I don't *** around with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, for our applications, we only use about 10% of photoshop's actual ability... I'm mainly going to CS5 in this instance because of it's 64-bit capability. This new PC we're getting will have Windows 7 Pro 64-bit on it with 12GB of RAM, an SSD for a boot drive and SATA drives for storage. I needed a 64-bit version of photoshop to take advantage of all of that... plus our other image processing software will also run in 64-bit. We're thinking this will take a big bite out of some of our processing time.

I just ordered that PC and bunch of new hardware stuff today, so hopefully I'll know how it all works in a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...