Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie starters


smash_n_dash

Recommended Posts

I said this in another thread but both Hardy and LaFell were locks for the first round during their college careers. Hardy was a lock after his sophomore year and LaFell was considered one of the 2 best receivers in college at the end of his junior year. Both guys were severely hurt by staying in school instead of leaving early. They aren't getting the national attention Clausen is getting but in their own right were just as highly touted at some point and actually have a much better chance of starting than Clausen barring a string of injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in another thread but both Hardy and LaFell were locks for the first round during their college careers. Hardy was a lock after his sophomore year and LaFell was considered on the 2 best receivers in college at the end of his junior year. Both guys were seveely hurt by staying in school instead of leaving early. They aren't getting the national attention Clausen is getting but in their own right were just as highly touted at some point and actually have a much better chance of starting than Clausen barring a string of injuries.

I think why Hardy dropped so much was cause of injures. I hope he will be solid but I cant help but to think he might be made of glass. Never really can tell though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think why Hardy dropped so much was cause of injures. I hope he will be solid but I cant help but to think he might be made of glass. Never really can tell though.

He was out several games his junior year for a non contact injury- he had a stress fracture to his right foot. His senior year he started out with a sprained ankle (the other one) and then broke his wrist. So yeah he has had injuries his last 2 years although had none his first 2 years.

He might be fine if we use him in pass rush situation where he isn't in on every down. Who knows about injuries though. Smith was healthy for a few years and broke his arm twice in 6 months time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...