Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

jersey schedule


homeblown

Recommended Posts

We may get a slight modification after Nike takes over. If not, it's going to be a long, long, long time before this team even touches up it's uni.

The only reason we even have blues is so we have an excuse to not wear black before December. This team is overly paranoid about the heat. If it gave us an advantage that's be great, but looking at the records for each color uni, it doesn't appear to. I'm sick of looking at those all white unis 10 to 11 times a year. I think it's safe to say that we will never have an all black uniform. What would it take the place of? As I said, the blue's are only there to make sure we have an alternative to the blacks anyways..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it is normally still hot in September and early October in Charlotte and the white uni's are not as hot as the black.

It can be very hot in Pittsburgh in September, yet the wearing of black jerseys and helmets does not seem to affect them.

It can be very hot in Baltimore in September and October as well, but they also manage to survive while wearing black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be very hot in Pittsburgh in September, yet the wearing of black jerseys and helmets does not seem to affect them.

It can be very hot in Baltimore in September and October as well, but they also manage to survive while wearing black.

Pittsburgh's average temp in September is 63 degrees and Charlotte's is 73 degrees so that is a big difference, plus Pittsburgh has 5 night games plus two 4 o'clock games so that is why they wear the black uni's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...