Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A good argument...


lightsout

Recommended Posts

So I can be a bit of a homer. Let's hear you guys duke it out. Who is the better running back: Deangelo Williams or Chris Johnson?

I'm saying Williams based on the whole body of work. Johnson is faster and more agile (a better athlete) but I wouldn't go so far as to say he is the better running back. I think it is more accurate to assume Williams can repeat his 08 season if he stays healthy than to say CJ will repeat a 2,000 yard season (or even a 1,700 yard season).

Also, I'm in a heated discussion on this on a prep board. PM me if you would rather have a link to THAT argument. (I'm duking it out with an illogical moron)

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are very similar... Johnson is faster but as long as Stewart stays healthy, DeAngelo won't get the carries or yards that Johnson does, so it's kind of a moot argument.

All things being equal, they would be so similar that it would be hard to make a comparison.

The best argument I can come up with is that in 2008, it was Williams first year as the full time starter and he split carries. It was also CJ's rookie year and he also split carries.

The stat line favors Williams in literally EVERY category for that year. Yeah, its Johnson's 1st year, but you don't become a veteran after 1 year. He's still young, he was good in 2008 and good last year.

I agree, it is a bit of a moot point. But if I'm looking at a back I would rather have as a PREMIERE back (not splitting carries) for say, 4-8 seasons, give me Williams any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...