Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Delhomme for Bulger?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Bulger was a top five QB when he had protection. When he doesn't, he's terrible.

Fixed. :D

If we're going to completely throw away our offense's leader, let's at least make sure it's an upgrade, Mmk? You know...better arm strength, accuracy, faster release...all of these apply. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixed. :D

If we're going to completely throw away our offense's leader, let's at least make sure it's an upgrade, Mmk? You know...better arm strength, accuracy, faster release...all of these apply. :)

So there's a team out there that's going to just help us out in that regard? This is a Wall Street league. You have to buy stocks when they're down to make a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there's a team out there that's going to just help us out in that regard? This is a Wall Street league. You have to buy stocks when they're down to make a profit.

Buying into Marc Bulger's giant contract is not what I would refer to as "buying when they're down".

I think we do a good job of the whole "buy low" thing in FA. We've had a lot of success with that. If we're going to do anything at QB, bring in some low risk, high potential reward player from FA, or deeper into the draft. (I know its a bad year for QB's, but a 5th or 6th round pick? Hell, take a QB for shits and giggles. Whats the worst that can happen?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...