Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trying to buy tickets...need to know if these are good seats


Pantherheel

Recommended Posts

Hello all!

I live in Oklahoma and I coming home to catch the 49ers game in October. I am trying to buy 4 tickets to the game. I came across tickets in section 109 row 1A. Looking at the seating chart, they look like amazing seats. My only concern is the row is against the wall. Is this too close to the field?!? Would we be able to see the entire field or would it be difficult to see plays on the other side of the field? I have always sat in the 500 sections. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks guys and gals.

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never sat in 109, but I've sat in 115 a few times on about row 6 or 7... the good is that you're right there and up close... the bad is that you can't see the other end of the field very well.

In my experience that fans in the 100 sections are more the "wine and cheese" crowd than those in the upper decks, so be prepared to be asked to sit if you stand much. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You quiery should be pinned for ever here and at every site in Pantherdom...putting to you simply...if you paid $5.00 for a ticket, you'd have a good seat!

I sit in Silver Club, 531-536 (nose bleed) and frankly sit with the team..yeh, on game day! "Doan worry, be happay" you are gonna be with friends, and pay out the ass for a Pepsi or Aquafina! Other thanthat you are in like Flint! Enjoy!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ive sat in all 3...lower, club, and upper.

lower and club are prettty baller just to be down there and see everyone up so clossse and cool and take pictures.

but. the 500s are pretty awesome. you can see the whole field, everyone up there is cool as hell, you can get really drunk and not worry about anyone tellin you to sit down...and you can pretty much yell what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is homeless?

You see those blue booths out in the parimeter? You got my ass laughin' on the floor Dockery!

BTW "Bully" ain't no bankers in my SC area, but there is an undertaker, a silk screen guy, a woman who works for CIA, and a bar tender who is dating a CEO...and I cannot figure out if he's dating the CIA agent! (Culinary Institute

of America)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...