Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grade The Panthers: Bengals Game


Skew

Recommended Posts

QB: D+ (better than Moore, but that's not saying much; fumble)

RB: C (still blame Davidson and OL for poor performance; fumble)

WR: C+ (improvement over last week)

OL: F (these guy can't pass block or run block consistantly)

DL: C+ (better pressure for 4 quarters than last week)

LB: B (as Kurb said to me during the game, you can build a team around Beason)

DB: B+ (much improvement over last week with the INTs and coverage)

ST: B (again, better than last week; no turnovers, but no big plays either)

Coaching: D- (do I really need to make a comment?)

Overall: D-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB: D+ (better than Moore, but that's not saying much; fumble)

RB: C (still blame Davidson and OL for poor performance; fumble)

WR: C+ (improvement over last week)

OL: F (these guy can't pass block or run block consistantly)

DL: C+ (better pressure for 4 quarters than last week)

LB: B (as Kurb said to me during the game, you can build a team around Beason)

DB: B+ (much improvement over last week with the INTs and coverage)

ST: B (again, better than last week; no turnovers, but no big plays either)

Coaching: D- (do I really need to make a comment?)

Overall: D-

only one I disagree with is LB and DB, I believe DB should be a B- and LB should be a C (LB could not get off blocks on the screen passes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB - C- (Did ok, considering what he had to work with. At no moment did I slap my face and say WTF ARE YOU DOING like when Moore was in there the past two games)

RBs - C+ (Deangelo did better than the previous two games, Stewart did not.)

WRs - C (Gettis played relatively well, Lafell had 1 nice catch, but shoulda made the catch in the end zone. Smitty was Smitty when Jimmy finally started throwing him the ball)

OL - F- (Seriously Kalil, those two botched snaps were all on him....the first was up in Jimmy's chest instead of his hands, the second barely made it to Jimmy's fingertips. Blocking was terrible overall too)

DL - B- (Yay, a DLman got a sack. Decent pressure most of the night, good run defense early in the game. Broke down though.)

LBs - C+ (Anderson F'd up big on Benson's TD reception. Overall not great by the LB corps)

DBs - B (Did pretty decently against 2 elite (but aging) WRs. Had about 2 or 3 fewer INTs than they should have...)

Special Teams - B (Cosby couldn't return for poo against them, and Goodson did ok overall)

Coaching - F- (I almost want to take away the minus because they actually looked better in the second half than first, but then I remember there was only like 15 rushes in the game total and the gameplanning in general seemed to suck)

Overall - D (Overall offense looked like it has the ability to grow, but not until the O-line gets their poo straight. Maybe it's the lack of Otah, I dunno. Defense looked pretty good for the most part, considering the field position they were constantly dealing with).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you need someone to run your multi-billion dollar business, maaayyyybe don't hire a guy whose previous work experience includes repeated blows to the head and literal brain damage but IDK.
    • Extrapolate that with every QB for that matter. I guarantee you there's quite a bit of missed opportunities and yards left on the field for everyone. Many NFL QBs deal with WRs not putting in A+ effort, subpar o-line play and other deficiencies. The great ones are able to rise above these issues and create opportunities for plays. Guys like Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes can both play in and out of structure, as well as find ways to get yards when things break down and mask mistakes by throwing guys open, creating opportunities from nothing, etc. Bryce Young has only shown he's able to make things happen when the rest of the team picks up his slack. Very rarely does he create those opportunities himself. When this is a consistent pattern year after year with Bryce where he shows up lackluster, it's a concern. This is year three and he should be elevating the team as a first overall pick this franchise traded up for.  He was far from elevating anyone against JAX. In fact, he needed others to elevate and create for him. Excuses may be fine for a rookie, but this is year three for the first overall pick. Not looking good so far.
    • I think the worst issue is coaching. Countless bad snaps, XL not getting his feet in or trying on runs plays, our centre being down field when he didn't need to be. All seem to be from poor coaching for me. I believe Canales is to soft to rip the players a new one when the fug up. Plus I honestly believe that Canales is slow getting his plays in giving Bryce less time to diagnose and adjust to the defence. Don't worry I could of head butted Bryce for that fumble and the 4th down throw aways but the other plays are explainable to me 
×
×
  • Create New...