Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WHat was Jeff Davidson F'ing thinking in the last few plays of the game?????


AnalyzeThIs#28

Recommended Posts

We had this game, and running the ball with no time outs and getting negative yards is just ridiculous! Why not though the ball and set up a game winning field goal. I'm so damn heated right now I don't know what the hell to do.

F the Saints, I hope Brees has an aneurysm tonight and dies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had this game, and running the ball with no time outs and getting negative yards is just ridiculous! Why not though the ball and set up a game winning field goal. I'm so damn heated right now I don't know what the hell to do.

F the Saints, I hope Brees has an aneurysm tonight and dies!

Our passing game sucked the whole game, we lost Smith, and have a rookie at QB at the Saints Dome. I can see why they would run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of you would be bitching about D-Will's decision if he had broken the tackle and scored. It was extremely close and we've all seen him break that for a long run dozens of times. I blame the O-Line moreso than Davidson...they have been pathetic all season and you just cannot give up a sack in that situation. Props to Gettis for a hell of a catch though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I still hate Brees. He's the only reason the Ain'ts are worth half a cent or so. Without him, they would be the like the Browns.

I'm just saying we had this game, and of course the f'ing Captain muffed the ball which lead to the Ain'ts winning. Without that we would have won..... hands down!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we wanted to run the ball why not at least spread the field and run out of a passing formation? When you line up in that set the D knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are running and since we realistically needed at least 5-7 more yards for a FG there was little chance of us getting that out of that formation anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...