Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Clowney, K Moore, or Guy?


ThatSeptemberDay

Recommended Posts

Im thinking Jarrett will finally be released after his second DWI. So the question is who will take his spot. Gantt says he thinks Clowney fits with our offense, and normally he doesnt talk about other Wr's. Easiest to pick would be Moore, but I think I would want Guy over Moore. And I think Clowney would be the best over all three. He is a fast guy and if we got him today he could share time with Edwards on sunday and give our third WR some speed down the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I wont say your wrong, but he didn't get any where near the amount of chances Jarrett has here. His first year he sat on the practice squad. Second year he hurt his collarbone, played in two games with one catch, then last year he played in 13 games and caught 14 balls, 191 yards long of 53 and a td. no starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I wont say your wrong, but he didn't get any where near the amount of chances Jarrett has here. His first year he sat on the practice squad. Second year he hurt his collarbone, played in two games with one catch, then last year he played in 13 games and caught 14 balls, 191 yards long of 53 and a td. no starts.

i dont know man maybe thats cause just like jarrett he never showed the coaching staff anything in practice worth playing him for......i watched hard knocks every week and the coaching staff bitched about clowney on a daily bases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know man maybe thats cause just like jarrett he never showed the coaching staff anything in practice worth playing him for......i watched hard knocks every week and the coaching staff bitched about clowney on a daily bases

lol well that doesn't work with comparing to Jarrett either. Jarrett looks like an all star WR in practice. Unfortunately thats the only time. There are guys that are good in practice and suck in game, and guys who suck in practice and do good in game. Maybe Clowney is the opposite of Jarrett but never got many chances for how he looked on the practice field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney has at least made some plays in NY before being released. He is who I would go with. Does it really matter though with Davidson only calling 7-8 passing plays in some halves? If they were thinking of opening it up a bit then I'd be concerned but it doesn't appear that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney is a legit deep threat. His draft stock fell cuz he lost production his senior year to Eddie Royal and Josh Morgan, 2 players making plays elsewhere in the league.

The only knock is, he got cut by the Packers initially (which is where WRs go to gain insane production) then got picked up by the Jets for a couple years and then had trouble getting on the field because of the crowded WR corp they have now(meaning they wanted more from him). and Unlike Moore and Guy.. he's made a couple plays in preseason AND the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...