Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Rams will win the NFC West by 2 games


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Rams have to prove they can win on the road first. They had two very winnable games at Oakland and at Detroit and couldn't do it.

Bradford is the real deal, but the Rams need a speedy receiver in the worst way. Their only real receiver is a white possession guy. Steven Jackson is only like 40 yards from breaking Eric Dickerson's franchise career rushing record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you in the fact that the Rams will win the division. But how do you predict the Rams swill win the division by two games, and have them winning tie breaker with Seattle at 8-8.

i was just spitting something out...100% random. i do think will win at 8-8 though. scratch the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rams have to prove they can win on the road first. They had two very winnable games at Oakland and at Detroit and couldn't do it.

Bradford is the real deal, but the Rams need a speedy receiver in the worst way. Their only real receiver is a white possession guy. Steven Jackson is only like 40 yards from breaking Eric Dickerson's franchise career rushing record.

Doesn't seem right, E.D. did that in 4 years (plus 3 games). :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't watch the games here in Turkey, but I just saw the highlights and Bradford looked really nice. Throws were on-time and everything. Bradford looks legit and the Rams look like they could be getting there. The NFC West can get kind of chaotic towards the latter of the season, so I'm not placing my bets on anyone in that division yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
    • I was just a teenager when I joined in 2013. I've loved the many opinions on this forum, even though several are infuriating. I've had several bad takes, myself,  that I've hopefully grown out of over the years.
    • i have not watched many gt games.  is it his accuracy that hurt his draft stock his armstrength or all of the above?
×
×
  • Create New...