Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Would you NOT Want The Ball?


Stovewood

Recommended Posts

The sun's not in your eyes. Winds are calm. Nice day altogether. You win the toss of the coin to determine first possession. BUT YOU DON'T ELECT TO RECIEVE!!!!!!! What the F............!!!!!! :mad2:

And of course Clausen didn't want it a couple of times. Has he got little hands? You know like that guy wit h the little hands on the hamburger commercial? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sun's not in your eyes. Winds are calm. Nice day altogether. You win the toss of the coin to determine first possession. BUT YOU DON'T ELECT TO RECIEVE!!!!!!! What the F............!!!!!! :mad2:

And of course Clausen didn't want it a couple of times. Has he got little hands? You know like that guy wit h the little hands on the hamburger commercial? :P

What difference does it make wether we get it now or later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because if they do have the lead going into halftime, they'll get the ball back and play time management the second half of the game.

Caugh! Choke! Snort! Time managment? WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A 2 MINUTE DRILL!!!!!!!! Sorry... We don't have a red zone plan. We have a defense and a field goal kicker. The best thing we could do would be to develop better down field blocking for when we intercept. Get the DB into the end zone or at least close enough for Kasay to boot one through. Then, "D" get the ball back and repeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason you challenge a "catch" for a 3 yard gain that would've had you at 4th and 6 instead of 4th and 9 but still out of FG range. We really have no direction/leadership.

Actually, I think if it had been overturned we would have been on the edge of field goal range (he went out around the 35 or I could be thinking of something else). That is the only reason I can think he would even challenge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybody got a clue what this is supposed to mean? 🤔
    • I figured as much. Hopefully he's just resting up and will be ready for round 3 (if we make it that far.)  Sucks to see. Hes been our best defender (besides Slavin) in the playoffs so far.
    • I've never bought into the idea. There's just too much at stake, even for front office people. Jobs are lost, trust is lessened, lives are altered, reputations are damaged and more. Throw in that the average front office person isn't as young as the average player. They may not have ten years ahead of them to salvage their careers. Any given year could be their last. The only person not guaranteed to suffer some direct form of consequence from losing is the owner, and even there you still have problems (fan reaction, team reputation, revenue, etc). You've also got massive egos in play on that front so it can get personal. Mind you, I do accept that there are "fire sales" in order to build for the future, but even those have consequences. They don't exactly guarantee success either. Poorly run teams often just wind up in the same circumstance a few years down the road. Sorry gus, but my tinfoil hat just hasn't fit me for quite a while.
×
×
  • Create New...