Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Would you NOT Want The Ball?


Stovewood

Recommended Posts

The sun's not in your eyes. Winds are calm. Nice day altogether. You win the toss of the coin to determine first possession. BUT YOU DON'T ELECT TO RECIEVE!!!!!!! What the F............!!!!!! :mad2:

And of course Clausen didn't want it a couple of times. Has he got little hands? You know like that guy wit h the little hands on the hamburger commercial? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sun's not in your eyes. Winds are calm. Nice day altogether. You win the toss of the coin to determine first possession. BUT YOU DON'T ELECT TO RECIEVE!!!!!!! What the F............!!!!!! :mad2:

And of course Clausen didn't want it a couple of times. Has he got little hands? You know like that guy wit h the little hands on the hamburger commercial? :P

What difference does it make wether we get it now or later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because if they do have the lead going into halftime, they'll get the ball back and play time management the second half of the game.

Caugh! Choke! Snort! Time managment? WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A 2 MINUTE DRILL!!!!!!!! Sorry... We don't have a red zone plan. We have a defense and a field goal kicker. The best thing we could do would be to develop better down field blocking for when we intercept. Get the DB into the end zone or at least close enough for Kasay to boot one through. Then, "D" get the ball back and repeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason you challenge a "catch" for a 3 yard gain that would've had you at 4th and 6 instead of 4th and 9 but still out of FG range. We really have no direction/leadership.

Actually, I think if it had been overturned we would have been on the edge of field goal range (he went out around the 35 or I could be thinking of something else). That is the only reason I can think he would even challenge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In 2025 Sam Darnold had over 1k more passing yards than Bryce Young on 1 less pass attempt. Repeat that to yourself several times and let it sink in. I absolutely love it when people come on here and invoke Sam Darnold like some gotcha. Darnold is the physical prototype for what anyone needs in a franchise QB. All the physical tools. Few people thought he would put it all together on the mental side of the position. He used to make some of the worst decisions you would ever see. At times in the past he made up for that with absurd throws and athleticism. But make no mistake whatsoever no matter how you feel about our starting QB. Bryce Young is a completely opposite conundrum. He lacks virtually any and all physical tools and athleticism and his elite processing is really mediocre at best on a good day and horrific on a bad day. These are realities people should have already been addressing instead of quadrupling down in year four.
    • The nice thing about the timing of Bryce's contract at least is that it's going to match up with the 2027 Draft Class. No excuses, he either becomes Rams 2nd half Bryce year long, or we draft his replacement.  Nothing wrong with carrying Bryce on his 5th year expiring and a 1st round rookie waiting in the wings. Let the rookie sit until the trade deadline, deal Bryce to a needy team at the time, profit. 
    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
×
×
  • Create New...