Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's Marital Debate...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

OK, my wife and I were having a discussion last week... then she had a girls night out Friday and discussed it with her friends and came back and told me what they all said.

I'm gonna conduct a poll on here and see what you all say.

Question:

On AVERAGE, how many times PER WEEK do you consider appropriate for a married couple to have sex.

This is not how much you are currently getting, but your ideal.

Please post the number, your sex and age and if you are married or not in your response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not married so I have no idea....

when I AM married, I would like it to be at least 2-3 times per week....basing that off of what Klong said aboot guys when they get older and they can't handle as much or need breaks...

but I honestly have no idea.

Are we talking sex and just sex? Or various other things that could possibly lead to sex?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not married so I have no idea....

when I AM married, I would like it to be at least 2-3 times per week....basing that off of what Klong said aboot guys when they get older and they can't handle as much or need breaks...

but I honestly have no idea.

Are we talking sex and just sex? Or various other things that could possibly lead to sex?

Well, I don't want to be any more specific than "sex"... I guess that can mean whatever you want it to mean. I don't want to skew the results.

I think KK may have meant that a little differently than what you're thinking... I think he meant that when guys are young, they can go 2-3 times in one session and as they age, that slows a bit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...