Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Skyline


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

i love the lotus but those two cars aren't even in the same league.

True, but considering the price and the manufacturer, I would take the Lotus even though you can get a few tenths of a second on the 0-60 with the Nissan. The real advantage is obviously the top speed, but that means little unless you routinely take your vehicle to the track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but considering the price and the manufacturer, I would take the Lotus even though you can get a few tenths of a second on the 0-60 with the Nissan. The real advantage is obviously the top speed, but that means little unless you routinely take your vehicle to the track.

i love them both. for the money, the lotus is about as cool a car as they make.

it's pretty much just a go-kart. but the gtr is a legit supercar.

if i was gonna buy one i'd get the lotus, if i was being given one i'd take the gtr.

this is what i really want. and i generally hate mercedes.

weblux580-04-2010-sls-amg-leakage.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love them both. for the money, the lotus is about as cool a car as they make.

it's pretty much just a go-kart. but the gtr is a legit supercar.

if i was gonna buy one i'd get the lotus, if i was being given one i'd take the gtr.

this is what i really want. and i generally hate mercedes.

It might be a go-kart, but it really does go. Honestly, if they could fit a V6 in there it would be a very dangerous go-kart.

The GT-R is nice but they could do better. Hell, the 458 is about 400kg lighter than the GT-R.

I don't know too much about Mercedes (or cars in general) but I have to say I like the looks of some of the Mercedes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • More praise of Renfrow from Tim Weaver (formerly of USA Today's Panthers Wire, now SI.com), and also what I told some of you, my Huddle friends, from the start: keep it all in perspective, and don't conveniently---and perhaps unfairly, discount and label Renfrow as a JAG when it was a very debilitating illness affecting his play.    "It's understandable to be skeptical about Renfrow's abilities at this late point in his career. After all, he missed all of last season due to a bout of ulcerative colitis that also took a serious toll on his production in 2022 and 2023."   When Renfrow is healthy, he's an above average guy. Being 29 may hurt or help his chances depending upon perspective, but 29 for receivers generally means that there's still (sometimes plenty) gas in the tank. Renfrow also obviously has plenty of motivation and has come with his game face.   "Then agan, seeing is believing and by all accounts Renfrow has been very impressive since joining the Panthers a few months ago... Where Renfrow will fit in Carolina's new-look receiver corps remains to be seen, but at this rate it's going to be hard to exclude him from the initial 53-man roster." https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/hunter-renfrow-sick-route-panthers-training-camp Read the room, ladies and gentlemen. And don't get it twisted; Renfrow isn't the most talented receiver on the team, but we have seen his ceiling, when healthy, in a Raiders offense that wasn't necessary replete with talent. Consider what he can do, especially in the slot, in a Panthers offense primed with young talent (no pun intended). From sick to "sick routes," eh?
    • That is literally what I am talking about. Those were 53 man cuts. Not at the beginning of camp.  I would say the odds of Barno being back are extremely thin.
×
×
  • Create New...