Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of change


Hawk

Recommended Posts

how late in life does one just concede and say they are too old for change and just accept what they have is enough etc?

Just got passed up for a couple promotions because I'm not an engineer...and in the oil biz, thats important, even though neither job required an engineer. Makes me think that maybe I've gone as high as I can with the formal education I have. I have no desire to go back to school, so thats out.

At almost 43, should I just be happy and live out my years? I don't mind what I'm doing and the $$$ and benefits and stability is there, but is that enough? I could probably sell my house and move to BC, work with my brother and make a pretty good living, but it would be a total career and life change.

I'm confused and disappointed at the same time,

rant off...back to arguing about cats and dogs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't sound satisfied, so why try to convince yourself you are? I didn't start my bachelor degree until I was 28. Even then I was hesitent because of the lenghty commitment, but now I'm looking into masters programs, so it's never out of reach. I hope to be done with my masters by 40. Just set yourself a realistic goal of what you want to achieve, with realistic timelines and milestones. It makes reaching your goal a lot easier when you can reflect on accomplishment along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't count how many times I have gone back to college.

I graduated with an Engineering degree in 1979. Worked on my Master's Degree from Clemson through the late 80's. Late 90's, I worked on 2 Associate Degree's from Rowan Cabarrus Comm. College. Now, I'm looking at getting into a program that mentors people wanting to go into radio.

I was like early 40's when I went to RCCC. There were still people older than I was there.

(Besides, you get to hang out with 20 something young ladies! :thumbsup:)

You need a lab partner? Sure!

Join your study group? Absolutely!

Go for drinks after class? Let's take my Corvette!

:yesnod:

Look into a Community College. Night classes once or twice a week and probably your company will pay for it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wait, you're 43? Nevermind.... we need to put you out to pasture anyway. You'll be on the front porch in the rocking chair soon enough, and then what will it matter. You'll have the old-timers disease and won't remember what you did for a living anyway. We'll be nice and come visit and tell you that you were famous and super successful.

:)

By the way, I'm 40 myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

School isn't as bad as it sounds. The bottom line is you have to make a decision about what makes you happy in life and you need to do the things required to get there, even if the steps don't make you happy.

If you want a promotion and all that and you feel the only way to get it is to go back to school, then you have to go back to school.

If you are happy with the money you make and the life your job allows you to live, then focus on that and spend the time you would've spent in school with the loved ones in your life.

My father was the latter. He didn't make that much money and neither did my mom but his job allowed him the flexibility to be around more often. He was always able to coach my sports teams, pick me up after school, etc etc etc and those were the things that were important to him. Sure he could have made more money but what does that really matter?

I've just recently graduated and begun my career so I am short on experience and somewhat short on education. My employer is paying for me to take some government accounting classes (no I'm not an accountant but close) because those will benefit me more right away and will pay for my Master's degree later on. I don't have a decision to make because I'm not at the comfort level you are.

There is nothing wrong with being comfortable if that's the life you choose to lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The OL has certainly been better than the trainwreck it was three or four years ago. As far as competitiveness let's apply some realism and clarity here. Quite a bit of the competitiveness in 2025 came from the defensive side of the ball which gave up the most points in league history the year before and was one of the bottom 5 units in terms of salary cap allocation for 2025 while the OL was top 3. We had the 26th passing offense last year. And if not for a herculean couple of games from Rico Dowdle we don't back our way into the division title or make the playoffs because we went 4-6 in our final ten games including being swept by the Saints who were starting a rookie 2nd round pick most of us mercilessly mocked when they selected him. In conclusion yes we've seen a difference. The question now is will the investment pay off the way we want. But the only way that happens is if we field a top 15 offense. If we can't even crack the top 20 then there need to be some very warm seats across the board. And I would hope just about anyone here should agree with that.
    • These Spurs are lowkey loaded.  If healthy, they could win it all this year (#2 in the West right now). I still think we’ve gotta keep Kalk on Wemby; he’s not getting completely dominated like every other NBA center.
    • Am I the only one who doesn't understand this fan bases infatuation with adding a high end TE? Especially when we have some bigger bodies in T-Mac and Coker who can slide into the slot at times and provide the big dependable target over the middle that most teams use their TE for. I mean, sure, it would be nice to have one of those elite TE's, but I feel like that's a position your better off going cheap with a committee who each bring something different to the table while spending our cap room on the more important positions. I like the potential we saw from Evans this year, Sanders could be a best if he can stay healthy, and Tremble has improved as well.  Just feels like spending high draft picks or cap space on other needs and more important positions is a better use of our resources than splashing on a TE in the draft or FA. Are those guys on the level of the Bowers or McBride's of the world?  Of course not, but we also are paying a fraction of the cost on our TE room than they are, and we're able to use that money for other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...