Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson, Beason, Connor...


coxc63

Recommended Posts

i wouldn't really buy into the numbers too much, our offense doesn't stay on the field very long. Now if our offense was producing and they still had those numbers then it would be a different story. Right now we are almost never in a game and teams are running the ball down our throat. If the games were more competitive teams would be throwing more on us but fact is we suck big time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you look at the defensive stats for most teams, you'll probably find linebackers are the leading tacklers.

Defensive backs tend to be next. That's not necessarily bad, though you don't really want secondary guys as your leading tacklers because it usually means opposing players are making it to the second and third level more often than you'd like.

If you look at the tackle stats on NFL.com, it's not until you get down into the fifties that you start seeing defensive linemen.

Yup, the DL's job is to occupy blockers so the LB's can make tackles. When a DB is your leading tackler = problem.

Our LB's have allot of tackles because they've been on the feild much more often then they should be. I believe we were giving up somewhere around 10 mins in time of posession going into the 49ers game?

Bottom line, our LB's have played well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defensive tackles rarely have more than 30-40 tackles in a season. To have three LB's making as many tackles as yours have tells me you have great linebackers! You don't want to see high tackle numbers from DB's unless you are bringing a safety up into the box frequently ...

I would kill to have your linebacking corp in St. Louis. It would make us a top 10 defense ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Someone correct me- doesn't Dave have a six year contract??? I think Dan Morgan does as well..... that's the price you have to pay once you get a rep for firing HCs....  
    • Brother re-check that guarantee...my page shows 30mill.....thats means he's staying in my book for at least til the end of 2026.  Im going to be my normal honest self, besides watching like half of the SB, I didn't know the guy. My guess is Panthers have a "planned model of paying players" and they almost had to spend a chunk of space on a DLman after Dbrown injury season gave them a nightmare out-come of worst D in NFL scoring. Once Milton got above Dbrown payments, they went with the plan B. A player whom the "co-GM" put his name with. Brad said turk would not be a problem off-field and leader, which the Panthers need badly. I dug in with the google-fu, I found out  I also found him playing lots of NT, which was shocking given the small frame. He seems ready for a bigger role and had a great SB too. IDK, I feel Dan Morgan was dead set on not going into this season without more DL depth and its there. The real deal is this, nearly all FA take one year to "adjust". I think turk is trying too hard and causing injuries as a result for his contract. Dbrown called turk "strong as hell" and I know for a fact Dbrowns has insane core and strength numbers. They lift together with the 50 LB difference...... you always lift with a guy who's similar in strength cause you can leave on the 8 wheels, let the other guy lift while you rest and go after him.  I do wish he had a better beginning to his panther career, 3 games for him to do so and it would cover up the low points if he made a few plays.... Again it felt like they almost had to make move/spend $$$ and Morgan was going to have DL depth this season no matter what...My best guess. 
×
×
  • Create New...