Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rob Zombie's Halloween


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So after folks suggested that it was a better than I believed it to be, I decided to give it a second chance. Turns out it's not as bad as I thought.

It's worse :mad:

What's clear to me is that Zombie didn't really get why the original Halloween was so scary. A significant part of what made Michael Myers so frightening was that you had no frigging clue what he was, or why he was what he was. He was a kid from a seemingly normal family, the family that might live next door to you, who one day just went ape s--t and nobody knows why. Well, almost nobody. There's the one English guy who realizes that he's just...plain...evil.

But instead of that, Zombie had to give him a backstory that turns him into just another picked-on kid from a white trash family who FINALLY HAD ENOUGH AND MADE THEM ALL PAY.

Yee...ha :rolleyes:

Throw in that original Michael never said a single word, always moved in a slow - almost inhuman - manner, and he certainly never gave a flying rip about anybody or went looking for a happy family reunion. Contrast that with new Michael who, while huge and with a better mask (that much I'll give him credit for) has lines and makes noises, moves in a fashion that's more manic than maniac and just wants to find his long lost baby sister and be loved.

Heck, he even changed Dr. Loomis from a slightly off-kilter guy who knows Michael is something straight from Hell to a normal child psychiatrist who sells books. To his credit, Zombie's teenagers actually look like teenagers instead of twenty-somethings playing teenagers, but that's more on the casting director than on him.

So to sum it up, thanks for taking all the mystique out of it Rob And thanks for taking one of the greatest screen bogeymen ever and turning him into a garden variety serial killer.

To paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen, Mr. Director, I've watched John Carpenter, been a fan of John Carpenter, John Carpenter is a favorite of mine...

Director, you're no John Carpenter :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mind the backstory so much. But I do see your point about the pure evil aspect of killing and not having a reason. Still liked it, but have only seen it once and probably will only see it once. Unlike the original that I have seen a couple of times since seeing the remake. Which puts the count around 1000 times, maybe a little high, but I have seen it a lot. hauntedpumpkin.gif

It was better than the remake of Friday the 13th. And I have the remake of Nightmare on Elm street on the Q just waiting for netflix to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...