Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everette Brown, Hardy, Goodson...


SnarkAttack

Recommended Posts

FINALLY Everett Brown had an impact on this game. A few tackles, a sack and some pressures. That draft day trade still looks bad, but it looked far worse earlier in the season. Hardy played well - I think he will be an impact player in the near future. Finally, Goodson is obviously playing lights out - racking up 100 yd games with the dame o line and defensive scheming that stymied Stewart/DeAngelo. I'm predicting we won't go into next season with the same group of RB's. I saw sign Williams and trade Stewart if we can get a 2nd for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our core of talent is going to be solid as hell next year. this awful year may turn out to have a few disguised blessings... lots of reps for future starters who otherwise wouldn't have gotten a chance to contribute.

all three of those players could be future pro-bowlers if they reach their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hands to the face.

:cool:

pressure leads to incompletions, turnovers, and sacks. don't judge the quality of a DE by his sack statistics.

Yes, Brown had an impact. He forced Flacco out of the pocket and into quick throws more than once. He had a couple of nice plays against runs where he didn't let the T set the edge, forcing the RB back inside.

Good game all around, unless you're just looking for reasons to hate.

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:cool:

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

There's are a lot more factor to performance that the glory stats. Sacks are vastly overrated, not enough credit is given to the rest of the demands of the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

I am sorry, what? Dude cost us a 1st AND 2nd round pick. Unrealistic Expectations? C'mon man. As far as I am concerned he should be right there with Charles Johnson on this defensive line. One sack, missed tackles...a bunch of spin moves that led to him being out of position. No thank you.

He isn't worth what this franchise wasted on him. He should've been picked in the 3rd round maybe the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...