Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we cut Richard Marshall

panthers1789

By panthers1789,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Boston Newbie

Boston

Posted
Posted

I say cut Lucas, let Marshall have a shot at the #2 CB Spot. Last year, he filled in for Lucas I believe and did a good job. I think he'd thrive in a starter position. He'd train harder, study harder, etc. He's a GREAT tackler too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

Hes horrible, everyone likes to bash Lucas, but forget that Marshall gets burnt even more than Lucas.

Cut or trade Marshall, draft a corner in round 2 or round 1(if we get a 1st rounder for Peppers).

I think that you do not cut your young and taleted players. I know that Marshall regressed this past year but he still show's a lot of promise.

Until we pick a new D cordinator I would think that we wouldn't cut any of our D players, unless someone is obviously overpaid or underachieving, because you do not yet know what your DC's scheme is going to be.

What if we cut Marshall and Lucas and the new DC wants to run an aggresive bump and run with his CB's? Well Marshall and Lucas both excel as physical corners. We just screwed ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mantal Newbie

mantal

Posted
Posted

I wonder if Marshall's regression had anything to do with Tim Lewis....

and yeah, I'd get rid of Lucas before Marshall. The latter is cheaper, and younger, and if someone's going to get burnt, I'd rather it be the cheaper younger one.

if he had Herm coaching him, he'd turn into a complete stud.

he makes less annually than dante wesley

lol, awesome then

He's looking to get paid this year! I can see him leaving pretty easily....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By strato · Posted

      We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • flagfootballcoach28
      Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”

      By flagfootballcoach28 · Posted

      I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • TheSpecialJuan
      Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...