Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nintendo DS


Seamonk

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking about getting a NDSLite since for the next month I'm going to be traveling a lot. It's certainly the cheapest option for me. However I'm not familiar with the games and such so I'm looking for suggestions on what are some good games for NDS that have been out for a while(old ones work better cuz they'll be cheaper). I'm gonna have a lot of time to burn waiting for flights..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've thought about the psp, but I'm not really into handhelds and I know i'm probably not going to play it again after this month or so. So money wise, DS is the less risky investment for me.

I have both and I use the PSP more. MGS and GoW alone make it worth having. If you go PSP don't buy the PSP go. If you go DS, get a DS lite. It can play gameboy games and there are a few good ones to be had. The Mario cart game is decent. It also depends on what you like playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I got a used DS Lite. Gamestop was giving out free 1 year warranties this weekend. The main reason i don't want a psp is it's wayyy more expensive and i don't really want something graphically entertaining as much as replay value and gameplay hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both. I actually have two DSi's - my son and I connect and play against each other.

You can watch movies on PSP - about the only thing you can't do on DS. I don't know what's up with all the "you can do more" stuff about the PSP.

Like someone else said, the Mario games are good, except Mario Party. Avoid that like the plague. With the DS lite, you can play the old Gameboy Advance games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking for more replay value and longer gameplay time than anything else. I've already gotten a Professor Layton game which I've heard is good for 12-20 hours depending on how fast you solve things. I'd get one of the other Professor Laytons but they're all still kind of expensive. I might go for an old used pokemon game or Mario kart at this point whichever is cheaper. I might risk going with The World Ends with you for a little extra money. I only say risk because I usually don't play RPGs much because of the time devotion required but I might have the time for this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...