Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Introducing Ricky Stanzi, QB, Iowa


MHS831

Recommended Posts

6' 4" 230 lbs. 25 TDs vs 6 Ints. Pro-style offense. Flying under the radar. Projected 5th round, but I bet that goes up to 3-4 by draft time.

We could draft Stanzi to develop and sign a veteran. Watch the video, but ignore the gayish qualities. Not his doing. I recommend watching a few of his interviews on You tube. He seems to have the "IT" factor. Supposedly has a high football IQ, average skills but got better every year. Leadership improved and was good as a SR.

Stanzi, a three year starter for the Hawkeyes, finished his career second all-time among Iowa signal callers with a 26-9 record. Entering the Hawkeyes bowl game earlier this week he ranked second in the Big Ten and 11th in the country in passing efficiency (160.5). He finished 2010 with 3,004 passing yards and 25 touchdowns while only throwing six interceptions.

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/youve-been-ricky-stanzi-rolled/7bf1852c59e8481356d67bf1852c59e8481356d6-306792564116?q=ricky%20stanzi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lacks vision, not a strong arm, bad under pressure, gets hurt a lot... I've watched alot of iowa games and he's good, but I would prefer an Andy Dalton over him.

I haven't, just going on stats and what I read and the few clips I could find. However, he is fundamentally sound from what I saw. 5th round is justified then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a lot of good Stanzi/bad Stanzi back in 09 - in the first 3 quarters of Iowa games he was finding new ways to try and lose, but come the 4th quarter, the clutch switch would come on. I just wonder if he's going to go through something similar in the NFL.

Our biggest problem is the inability to spot potential at QB. If you can't spot talent, develop it, or coach it, you wil never have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like stanzi alot, he is super clutch, but he has that jake delhomme thing going on where he can be god aweful or perfect depending on the day, and early in games he sucks for some reason, he also has injury problems. but he runs a pro style offense and has pretty good football iq from what i understand, could be a great 3rd round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEW NAME"

Colin Kaepernick, QB, Nevada. a project, but has a good to decent arm, not real accurate, but runs 4.6 and is 6'6" tall. Led comeback to beat Boise St.

If we can't find a good QB, the best thing to do is build the cast around what we have or will sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...