Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Year's Rookie Receivers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just something I thought worthy of discussion after a little research today.

(I have a vague feeling someone may have brought this up before, but I can't find it; if it's a repost, I apologize)

In the 2010 Draft, five receivers were selected before Brandon LaFell, several others prior to David Gettis.

Here are the stats for the top five receivers taken on the year (from NFL.com)

Demariyus Thomas (1st Rd, 22nd Overall, Broncos) 10 games, 2 starts, 22 catches, 283 yards, (12.9 avg), 31 YPG, 2 TDs, 3 fumbles

Dez Bryant (1st Rd, 24th Overall, Cowboys) 12 games, 2 starts, 45 catches, 561 yards, (12.5 avg), 46 YPG, 6 TDs, 1 fumble

Arrelious Benn (2nd Rd, 39th Overall, Bucs) 15 games, 9 starts, 25 catches, 395 yards, (15.8 avg), 64 YPG, 2 TDs, 1 fumble

Golden Tate (2nd Rd, 60th Overall, Seahawks) 11 games, 0 starts, 21 catches, 227 yards, (10.8 avg), 52 YPG, 0 TDs, 1 fumbles

Damian Williams (3rd Rd, 77th Overall, Titans) 16 games, 1 starts, 16 catches, 219 yards, (13.7 avg), 39 YPG, 0 TDs, 0 fumbles

Naturally, several more receivers were taken before Gettis came up in round six.

Here are the numbers for LaFell and Gettis:

Brandon LaFell (3rd Rd, 78th Overall, Panthers) 14 games, 2 starts, 38 catches, 468 yards, (12.3 avg), 33.4 YPG, 1 TDs, 0 fumbles

David Gettis (6th Rd, 198th Overall, Panthers) 15 games, 13 starts, 37 catches, 508 yards, (13.7 avg), 33.9 YPG, 3 TDs, 0 fumbles

Yes, situations are different, but the number of games and starts are fairly comparable down the line.

Of the first five taken, only Dez Bryant can rightly be said to have outperformed Gettis and LaFell. Do they have the best numbers of all rookies? No. Mike Williams took the rookie title. Jordan Shipley - taken six spots behing LaFell by the Bengals - was also better (both Williams and Shipley outdid Dez Bryant). Blair White was close.

Still, fourth and fifth best rookie years for a 3rd and 6th round pick?

Not too bad :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think numbers are very misleading.... To me the question is if those other wr's were on the panthers would their stats be any different from gettis and Brandon... For me the answer is no.

I think someone had to catch the ball, and when you have games with all rookie Wr's they are gonna get yards.

Shipley might of had more yards than Dez, but in no way did he outplay him this year. Dez can did what shipley did, but shipley could not do what dez did in Dallas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think numbers are very misleading.... To me the question is if those other wr's were on the panthers would their stats be any different from gettis and Brandon... For me the answer is no.

I think someone had to catch the ball, and when you have games with all rookie Wr's they are gonna get yards.

Shipley might of had more yards than Dez, but in no way did he outplay him this year. Dez can did what shipley did, but shipley could not do what dez did in Dallas.

Pretty much all of them were actually in better offenses with more established quarterbacks throwing to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much all of them were actually in better offenses with more established quarterbacks throwing to them.

But they were not the only option or #1 reads on their teams.... that's the difference. When your rookie Wr's are your #1 and #2 reads and not your #3 and #4 reads they are gonna see more passes com that way.

The only way for me to objectively look at the situation is what do I think our Wr's would have done in other situations, and what would those other Wr's have done in Carolina's situation!

For me my answer is that they would not have put up those numbers on other teams, and the Wr's for the other teams would have had similar yards in Carolina.... The only other alternative would have been Carolina passing for 50 or less yards a game.... The passes/yards have to go to someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they were not the only option or #1 reads on their teams.... that's the difference. When your rookie Wr's are your #1 and #2 reads and not your #3 and #4 reads they are gonna see more passes com that way.

The only way for me to objectively look at the situation is what do I think our Wr's would have done in other situations, and what would those other Wr's have done in Carolina's situation!

For me my answer is that they would not have put up those numbers on other teams, and the Wr's for the other teams would have had similar yards in Carolina.... The only other alternative would have been Carolina passing for 50 or less yards a game.... The passes/yards have to go to someone.

Gettis had more starts than everyone but Benn, but not LaFell. He only started two games.

Add in that our top read is Steve Smith most of the time when he's healthy.

I'm not saying they're the best receivers in football, but I do believe they've shown as much potential as anyone. And that...makes me happy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettis had more starts than everyone but Benn, but not LaFell. He only started two games.

Add in that our top read is Steve Smith most of the time when he's healthy.

I'm not saying they're the best receivers in football, but I do believe they've shown as much potential as anyone. And that...makes me happy :)

So you do not believe those players could have done the same thing had they been in Carolina?

Steve Smith.... injured off and on

No real #3, and #4 WR

No True TE threat on the team....

Playing Wr on a team with not many options to catch the ball. Like I said I honestly believe those players would have produced the same numbers here in Carolina!!!

That is the only way for me to objectively evaluate them.... If you don't think those other players would have put up similar stats HERE in Carolina... then that's just your opinion and I will respectfully disagree with that 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you do not believe those players could have done the same thing had they been in Carolina?

Steve Smith.... injured off and on

No real #3, and #4 WR

No True TE threat on the team....

Playing Wr on a team with not many options to catch the ball. Like I said I honestly believe those players would have produced the same numbers here in Carolina!!!

That is the only way for me to objectively evaluate them.... If you don't think those other players would have put up similar stats HERE in Carolina... then that's just your opinion and I will respectfully disagree with that 100%

You're talking about something that's impossible to project, though.

You could throw in any number of "what ifs" (injuries, schemes, opponents, whatever).

In the end, there's no way to say for certain whether someone else might have done better here or not.

What we can look at is where they all actually performed where they were, and for those results for this season, I'm pretty pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about attempts though, how many times these guys were thrown too? Seems easy to just post stats but not the whole picture. Man I really hate stats they really don't tell you anything. Overall, the only reason we did OK is they were drafted later rounds the fact is no rookie WR was anything special this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...