Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gta v?

jtnc

By jtnc,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

bredy087 Newbie

bredy087

Posted
Posted

lol no more car launches for you googoodan? I grew up with the GTA series and played this crap out of some San Andreas. It would be cool to have another GTA game but to me they are just too damn long and too open ended. Might as well just make them into MMOs or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Too long and open ended? you mean you get too much for your money? GTA series is fuging legendary and I hope it stays the same. the original really wasn't that good but how can you argue with 4, 3 or the best ever vice city? They were master peices! The only thing I want is a bigger map and even more personable relationship simulations. More similations in general, like maybe owning a house and cars and building a mansion and to be able to do it selling drugs or catching bad guys up to you sort of thing. I love GTA, the game is awesome. GTA is so much a better game than red dead, which was horrible. Why would you settle for an even more linear game. Hugely open games with mass exploration and endlessness value is what GTA is all about. If they could somehow encompass co-op they would be even more amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

III to vice was two years

vice to SA was almost two years

SA to 4 was four years

so if they are adding even more content, which follows their trend, I woul estimate spring 2012. Rockstar does not like to release games in the 'prime time' holiday season. In fact for 4 they were going to wait until the holiday season but where spending way too much budget.

I hope they take their time, it's 2011 people we need to really expect more from our games than all this linear crap. The guys are chargin 65 bucks then another 15 in a few months for updates. the next console platform is not but a couple/few years away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

vice city was awesome with a miami vice/scarface theme.....what would you guys like to see in the next one? set in todays time? the 90s?

I'd like to see Today. I've heard it may be based in London or Los Angeles again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...