Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

bP's conspiracy theory


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

not really- just connecting the dots..

why would Silas put Collins in the game against the friggin' Heat- of all teams to put the undrafted rookie PG that hasnt been able to break into the lineup against teams like Detroit, Sacramento etc.. why would Silas do that in 2nd half, crunch time?

was he really a genius at work?

was he throwing in the towel early?

was he giving his PG of the future a taste at real NBA ball?

No..

if you look at it minutes played, Livingston played only a little over a minute more than Collins played.. its more probable that Livingston is having some issues with the knee (which we really dont need right now) and couldnt go.. after the west coast trip he probably needed some rest- hopefully he got it tonight and is ready to go against the Mavs and Celts..

or We Be in Trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlotte Observer article quoted Silas in saying that Livingston didn't get anymore min because he passed up on two open shots in the first half.

Wait, don't bring truth into this discussion...I want wild theories and conspiracies. Much more entertaining!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, don't bring truth into this discussion...I want wild theories and conspiracies. Much more entertaining!

Actually it is because livingston is being shopped as an accessory to jax or gerald wallace for lamarcus aldrigde and a 1st from portland.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...