Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for 1099 people or previous 1099....


Zaximus

Recommended Posts

So I have an interview about a 1099 job tomorrow and I'm really iffy on it. I've never done this, previously I was just an employee (in the IT industry btw). It's a 3-6 month contract with possible extensions. The pay is close to what I was making at my last employee job (which of course this had paid time off, sick days, etc).

I currently have unemployment, I'm on my 2nd extension and could get up to next year on it (but I really want off it). If I take this job, and in 3 months they don't need me, I could get let go and have no chance at unemployment, correct?

I'm really hoping someone here has done this (in the IT industry) cause it may be different than other 1099. I'll probably go to the interview, I mean, why not? Can they promise a certain amount of hours you get per week so I know I'm at least getting full time?

I'm just not sure if having to pay my own taxes, pay more FICA (cause I read the employer would usually pay half those), having no sick days/paid time off, etc. Then I would have to get my own tools, use my car with no reimbursement, and a lot of other things.

Really undecided at this point. If it was a 6-12 month contract instead of a 3-6 month I'd definitely feel better.

Should I make sure I get paid at least more than I was making at my last job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done it before (in IT). You should definitely get paid more (about 30% more) than your last job.

This. As a contractor you should be getting paid significantly more.

Paying FICA sucks but keep ALL your receipts, as a contractor you can write off everything. Keep your books in order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to 1099, you should get at least 20% more, but should be closer to 25%. The reason is you are taking all the risk. Also, do a credit check on the company as you are at their mercy to be paid. Unlike a W2 who gets paid on a timely basis, 1099ers get paid whenever the company feels like it. I 1099ed with a manufacturing firm for a year and I hated it. The MFers would pay their bills 3 months behind like clockwork and I had to suffer waiting to get paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to 1099, you should get at least 20% more, but should be closer to 25%. The reason is you are taking all the risk. Also, do a credit check on the company as you are at their mercy to be paid. Unlike a W2 who gets paid on a timely basis, 1099ers get paid whenever the company feels like it. I 1099ed with a manufacturing firm for a year and I hated it. The MFers would pay their bills 3 months behind like clockwork and I had to suffer waiting to get paid.

Not only that, but you are resposible for the state and federal taxes. So you have to put money away what a company would normally take out to cover that. When I was in real estate it was hard to put away that 25-30% for taxes and not touch it! On top of that, you have to pay for your own health care.

I hated being a 1099er.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...